I don't get it with Huddersfield. It's a great ground with good facilities, practically on site parking. Easy enough to get away from. A good team for a few years now. The coach is a good bloke, not given to talking rubbish. The chairman has made it his life's work.

And yet the people of Huddersfield don't support their team. And as far as I'm aware they have really tried to market it. Some of the season ticket deals were amazing a few years back.

If Wigan don't win it I really hope the Giants do. And it would be great to see them play the Aussies in front of a full house. Sadly I don't think that's likely. Although there was a full house for the England v Ireland World Cup game so you never know.

They did, though it's debatable that they should have to pay. I don't imagine the Aus teams are forking out for the pleasure, why should ours?

We really at the opposite ends of the spectrum on stuff.

Hudds for me are the epitome of everything wrong with modern day RL. What's thier youth set up like? How do they want to grow the game? How many fans do they bring to away games and how do they as a club contribute to the overall health of the game?

Wigan, Leeds & Saints produce youngsters every year that eventually filter into every layer of the game. They take rafts of fans home and away which in turn support all the club's in the league with gate receipts. They invest in new areas outside of the heartlands etc. What do they get in return, as to me it all looks one way? Heck it's taken how many years to get a marquee rule passed, which imo wasn't asking much.

Yes we do differ. I'm not going to bore you with my thoughts as you know them already other than making the obvious point that the game needs different clubs competing to keep up interest. As it is I'd imagine people are getting pretty bored with Wigan, Leeds and Saints winning everything.

Didn't it pretty much come down to the English clubs having to stump up the guaranteed cash before the Aussie teams would turn up?