If josh had a good centre ..if the ball was passed to him ..how can he prove himself if the play goes forward forward n pass to the other wing ..I'm fuming at his comments about josh he looks like he is putting a winger down so much as if there are not other players to blame let's see how many times josh gets the play of ball this week .. I say waney is defamation josh character .. Just remember the past 2 years and how many tries he got .. The ball was played equally down each wing ..josh had the best centre who is a centre not a front row ..glad someone else things is a public bashing ..

I'd say RTS and Brett Morris are better than him (though both play fullback at club level), and I think Burgess will surpass him in the next two years...though again, he may be moved to fullback for the Roosters briefly, depending on whether Latrell Mitchell is ready at the start of next season - he only turned 18 a month ago, but is absolute class.

My opinion on the Origin thing is because Aussies seem to view the wing with less importance than we do. Once a player is used to playing first grade, and is a dangerous player, you don't get enough opportunities on the wing, whereas if you can move them to fullback, they'll be involved a lot more. It's not that QLD and NSW are having to pick players (truly) out of position because there's such a lack of good wingers, it's that most of the best wingers have been moved to more pivotal positions.

Yes, agree with all of that.

who would you say that is that, out of curiosity?

Burgess. Per match him and Hall are pretty similar for metres, clean breaks and tackle busts, Burgess does better in average gain per carry, has loads more try assists, less missed tackles, less penalties and more tries. He has made more errors than Hall though. Burgess is probably better in the air too.

Yes, that.