Apparently the 1st team players pay a percentage back to the chairman ( been told 20%) for his investment in to the club/business as TBH although he may act like a fan, at the end of the day he is a business man who knows how to maximise his capital & investment.

If you are on 100G then 80G is still alot, but if you are only maybe on 30G and that drops to 24G you can understand why players are leaving for money.

In todays WEP hansen all but signed for salford. Is it just me or is anyone else getting slightly peed off with the high turn over of players every year?

Is this serious?

How anybody could possibly even consider for a mano-second there may be a grain of truth in this is beyond me. I've read some seriously stupid stuff on here over the years (who just said "you wrote most of it"?) but this takes the biscuit.

I'd rather some of these lads weren't leaving but it's a business at the end of the day and if it means we keep the younger lads who are coming through, then that's the way it has to be unfortunately.

GF winners 2010 & 2013
CC winners 2011 & 2013
LLS winners 2010 & 2012

Lima, Finch, Hoffman, Roberts, Gleeson, Carmont, Leuluai, Fielden, Coley, J. Tomkins, Riddell, Prescott, Deacon, Hock Have all left in those 3 seasons for one reason or another and it's not done us too much harm.

IL/Wane etc will and should be judged on results. If in 10 months time we've not won the CC, we're 5th in the league and out of the playoffs we can say it was a mistake letting Hansen, Mossop, Richards and Tomkins go.

Out of the lads I mentioned above, a lot of them are still playing. If we'd have kept hold of them we wouldn't be seeing the likes of Hampshire, Powell, Farrell, Crosby, Burke, Burgess, Manfredi, Thornley, Williams, Tierney, Lloyd, Hughes, Greenwood etc coming through and we'd be where we were a few years ago when we were having to buy a team every year.

It's certainly the first I've heard of it. If there was any truth in it it would have come out long before now particularly when a few on here were using anything they could to beat IL with last season.

I would assume it's .

maywell be...

but it came from a family member of a current 1st team player.

I find it hard to believe but why would a player make something like this up?

Yeah, but why would he play for Wigan if it was true?

I know I wouldn't.

So Lenagan takes 320K per year off the players?
20% of £1.6 million.

Nice work if you can get it.

I've heard some bull on here in my time but that tops the lot of it

Roll on January, let's get some rugby played.

So last year he was "trousering" the transfer monies. And now he is taking back money from players!

Well as far as conspiracy theories go its a new one. But i guess evil lairs in hollowed out volcanos dont just pay for themselves.