Quote: DaveO "We know slater didn't but the fact him and Hock more or less did the same thing and what each coach did about it says a lot. As does the policy of each team.
Will being strict disciplinarians by setting such rules meaning Hock going out, having a pint and the coaches reactions to that (not just with Hock) benefit England? Or will letting Slater be "off duty" after a game meaning he doesn't have to be disciplined for having a pint (and getting in trouble afterwards) benefit Australia?
To me the answer is obvious. Australia have the more pragmatic approach to the competition.'"
I agree that McNamara, on the face of things, seems to have over-reacted. And the Aussies appear to have been more pragmatic. But with Hock I suspect there has been more to it than having a beer. Possibly its was the last straw of a series of events, stretching back to South Africa or even earlier camps?. He does have a track record. We just don't know.
Its always tempting to label a coach as misguided or having poor judgement (not saying you are doing this). Its an easy thought process to drift into, and I have to stop myself labeling him such. The reality is that he is likely to be different.