i wasnt looking for anything , but i was sick of hearing ''leeds are on empty'' or ''he's out on his feet'' etc etc

leeds got tired because of the way we played the game

our forwards layed the platform for the backs to control and kick them to death

Apart from McShane didn't Leeds have their 1-13 starting line up out there?
If there were players busted then why did they play them?
They have a large squad so why not play players who are fully fit?

I don't disagree it was said as if they had every right to be after last weeks saints game when earlier on THEY told us Wigan had played the most rugby this year and we get no credit for our fitness levels compared to theirs

Well thats fair enough. I stopped listening to them years ago myself, so can understand the frustration. It went to pot when they moved Phil Clarke from the sideline to commentary box for me.

Seeing it back I still don't have a clue. We had 11 players between middle of posts and left wing and only two on the right side of the field.

The idea that Stevo (and, indeed, almost anyone whose background is with another Yorkshire team) will be supportive of Leeds is laughable.

The problem for Leeds was that at least three players were clearly not fit, and probably shouldn't have played - although they were still arguably better than the alternatives. Others were OK but not match fit. But you can't win them all