Sinfield is a class act all round. He has PROVEN his quality consistently for a decade and off the field conducts himself superbly. Little things like this article support that www.thetelegraphandargus.co.uk/s ... _Sinfield/ he is the 1st to arrive and is the last to leave staying behind to practice his goal kicking after everyone else has left. Choosing to do this rather than going home to his wife and kids an hour earlier each night Its easy to discredit people while they are still around and playing because everyone makes mistakes, but when the whole story is written, he will be regarded as one of the best players/captains RL has ever seen For the career he has had, not to win the golden boot would have been a travesty.

Sinfield is a class act all round. He has PROVEN his quality consistently for a decade and off the field conducts himself superbly. Little things like this article support that www.thetelegraphandargus.co.uk/s ... _Sinfield/ he is the 1st to arrive and is the last to leave staying behind to practice his goal kicking after everyone else has left. Choosing to do this rather than going home to his wife and kids an hour earlier each night Its easy to discredit people while they are still around and playing because everyone makes mistakes, but when the whole story is written, he will be regarded as one of the best players/captains RL has ever seen For the career he has had, not to win the golden boot would have been a travesty.

based on that criteria i would have thought jamie peacock would have been just as much (more imo) deserving?

As it is and bear in mind im a big fan of sinfield (and if iirc i stated on a post on the leeds board a few years back when a lot of leeds fans were giving him stick) and hes like farrell in that you wont realise how good he is till hes gone.

But best player in the world even trying to take goal kicking and captaincy into account.

No.

Does it bother me. no,if it winds the aussies up all good and well.
But please dont try and rewrite the criteria or justify it for him being a role model (which he is a superb one).
He just isnt the Best Player in the World IMHO (He "May Get into my Top 25").

And as much as "Some" Wigan fans are going overboard to berate the decision (And other fans on other boards too) there is as much OTT by "Some" Leeds fans in trying to Justify it.

but he is a prop forward - props get overlooked for golden boot imo

but you are right Peacock deserves to have won it also

if we'd have had sinfield in our side in the playoffs we wouldve won the gf.

he took us apart in the first 40 at our place.

Unless you are an aged Andy Farrell.

I would have the aged Farrell as captain ahead of Sinfield.

Sinfield is a great captain but Farrell could carry a side in a way that no one else in the modern era has. Just look at what happened when he left.

If you want an example of leadership, just watch him in the famous 2004 game v Leeds. Incredible display.

Farrell was a fantastic captain. Second only to Dean Bell imo.

WELCOME BACK!!!!!! We missed ya....

I cant believe people have given this much thought to it, its the most pointless award going! Its decided by a few ex pro's (probably gary schofield and bobbie goulding) and the happy clappers at Rugby League World magazine. The magazine probably has a readership of 1000 people, and has no influence on the game what so ever

I think that Malcolm Andrews article in League Express gets it right.

The decision by League Publications to reduce the number of overseas judges who vote on the Golden Boot was wrong (no matter what the outcome would have been).

The decision to reduce the number of overseas judges was made because there were no key international games during 2012....expect that there was in the Southern hemisphere - a huge mistake when you consider how uncompetitive the England games where during 2012.

Traditionally and in keeping with the principles of the original award consultation and research should be carried out with many different international sources before making a final decision on the winner of the award.

An interesting one. Farrell was undoubtedly magnificent in his efforts as player & leader, as you suggest he held that team together as his personal playing ability deteriorated & Wigan's standing faded. Sinfield is never going to lead by sheer physical effort & screaming at his players from behind the sticks or at a stoppage, he is physically not up to it, nor mentally does he approach captaincy that way. Sinfield needs great players around him to lead around the park, he would be absolutely devastating if he was captain of the Aussies, which is the reason I think he has struggled to shine against the Aussies (along with 99% of British players). If Sinfield plays against the Aussies he has to be the captain & direct everything, he is the best I have ever seen at that, but he is not the best player in any individual position.