Quote: SmokeyTA "I would hope that it wouldn’t be beyond us to structure the team to include both.
I can understand that moving Tomkins forward would blunt that part of his game, but surely it wouldn’t be two difficult to put in place some sets and set plays where Hardaker moved forward and Tomkins stepped back and played as the extra man chiming into the line.
We can get a bit hung up on numbers on backs in this country, Imagine defending against Burrow, Roby and Sinfield, with Hardaker and Tomkins offering options.'"
The problem being that you then find yourself with Hardaker in the line in a play-making role which he doesn't do at Leeds let alone Test level.
The trouble in any event with doing it in set plays, is that they are set, and hence not the spontaneous off-the-cuff stuff that is sort of the point of having a full back who selectively comes into the line when he sees an opportunity. You might get away with it Sinfield was at 13, which is the only way I can see you getting all 5 of those players you mention on the pitch at once. But I don't think that's where he will play.