Must say I expected 2 taking into account the time he got sent off. Mainly due to beng late and his previous rather than the intent, but hey ho thats the way it goes.

To be fair I think the sending off may have gone against him.
If it had been put on report I don't think the ban would be as harsh.

The sending off made it seem really bad. I mean in what world was that as bad as what rangi chase did? Or worse than what ablett did to Tomkins a couple years ago?

I have to agree the sending off was correct and the ban itself is ok although 2games may have been more fitting, however when you compare it to Chase's forearm smash then the whole system is just wrong ,Chase deserved at least 8 when compared to Mickey Macs..

Probably not, unless he has been sent off, then there's a chance.

Three matches for that ? I'm not a Wigan fan and even I find that a ludicrous ban. I hope he wins his appeal.

Please get with the programme. Sack cloth and ashes are all the rage dontcha know.

If we could link to YouTube I could show you several incidents worse than what MM did that did not result in the player being sent off or sanctioned in any way and I am talking about high and late tackles not just some random bit of foul play.

The club will be appealing because they think the ban is OTT and given the fact these videos I mention show worse high shots that went unpunished the club has a point.

you know you could give the descriptions for people to search for on yowchobe on here.

/watch?v=GV_2O2_PJKU

I don't blame the club for appealing. 3 games is too much given what has gone before.

Appeal lost.