Im sure you have your Wigan goggles on and I have my Widnes goggles on .... but I thought the ref gave you more than he gave us. Some of the penalty decisions left me rather confused thats for sure. Bottom line is the ref doesnt matter, with Tomkins in the team you would of won. Although the young lad you had at full back was great, 2 tries and took a lot of high balls very well.

I had to laugh at the penalty Hicks gave you towards the end, that just about sums up what an absolute useless twonk he is. Inept....

Seen the tries on SKY. No problems with any for both sides.

well the head injury thing watch sky the wire vs leeds match you will see carvell down with head/neck injury while leeds attacking the line, ref did not stop play until the hand over. we were lucky leeds did not score but that is the sport we play. the refs tend to wait for break in play if the injured player is away from the action.

I have no problem with that ruling,we dont want to end up like football with players feigning injury to stop the game.

I think there's enough integrity in the game and honesty among the players to avoid that happening, although you can never be sure.

I have no issue with the referees playing on as often as possible, and while in the incident yesterday the player being down did seem to cost Wigan I think Widnes would have scored even if the play had been stopped.

The only issue I have with it is that I feel the game should be stopped if a player needs to be aided by several medical staff and the stretcher is brought on. Given how play can go from one end to the other in seconds I think that is the point when the game should be stopped, as there are far too many potential obstacles should play quickly switch to the other end of the field.