Quote: MadDogg "The more I think about it, the more my interest in Super League drains. I still have a high interest in the sport and in the Wigan club. But how can you get excited about this competition with this format?
As long as you finish in the top 8 which Wigan are guaranteed to do, it doesn't matter where we are at the end of the 27 rounds. You get a slight advantage for finishing in the top 4 but thats it.
I'm shocked to be honest at the extent to which the format has taken away my enthusiasm for the domestic year. I don't want to follow a competition that rewards mediocrity.'"
I am not sure you do.
We had to play...
Saints (H)
Catalans (H)
Saints (A)
Leeds had to play...
Hull (H)
Hudds (A)
Wire (A)
I don't think Leeds had a more difficult task than we did despite finishing 2nd and them finishing 5th. I know you get a second chance finishing in the top 4 but it doesn't make much difference as there is a likely chance you will need it. I doubt we would have needed a second chance playing Hull at home.
Under the old top 6 system (which didn't need changing) Leeds would need to beat... Hudds (A), Saints (A), Wigan (A) and then beat Warrington in the GF. A much more fair task for a team finishing 5th.
Instead they played the team in 8th, the team 1 place above them who they had beaten during the regular season and then lifted their performance hugely for one game and got to the final. Now this is not a dig at Leeds, they were superb and deserved to win those games, this is a dig at the system which helped them do so.
Personally I would have loved for Wigan to finish 5th this year. Play Hull KR at home and then go away to Hudds.