Quote Horatio Yed="Horatio Yed"I love the CC so i won't pan it, but with the CC you could be lucky enough to not face anyone of note and win it.
Now imagine this wigan v saints
Wire v leeds and hudds v (lets say Cas)
Wigan beat saints, wire beat leeds
Cas beat hudds
Then next round wire v cas, wigan v catalan, then cats and cas win then next round both cats and cas go out. All the big teams take each other out and some team whose biggest game was Cas win the cup.
It makes it romantic but it doesn't make it the premier comp.
The Gf is usually 2 teams at the peak of their game which,for a neutral makes it a better quality game.'"
And I think most people are now more aware of this than ever before.
In the pre-Grand Final era, almost every trophy, with the exception of the League Trophy, was decided on a knock-out basis. So there was very little to compare the Challenge Cup with. It just happened to be the biggest of several similar knock-out trophies because its final was at Wembley.
Now, after a decade of Grand Final epics, especially as this coincided with a troubled times for the Challenge Cup - nomadic shifts between venues, the pre-season experiment, several mismatched finals - people have a much more grounded view of which is the more exhilarating event.
My problem is, lover of the CC though I am, I have a bad feeling that the genii is now out of the bottle. The CC semis and final have the potential to be as exciting as they ever were, but they won't always be, and I can't ever see a time again when the CC is viewed by the majority of the fans as the game's most prestigious competition.