In all fairness i cant understand why more clubs havent gone for him he is a class . I for one will miss seeing him in a warriors top. Him being mates with long could be bad for the club but it could pay off for them him and briscoe on the same wing would be good combination as we saw what he did with goulding last year. The bad point to all this is we pay £100k for him and let him go for nothin id ave atleast looked at a swap deal for briscoe or yeaman both good players

I know it's Hull but do you seriously think they would consider swapping Briscoe or Yeaman for a 30 year old with discipline issues? The only reason they are in for him is because he's free, and if you believe the local rag they're only prepared to offer a deal to the end of the season.

I think the points about long maybe wrong. He's got problems at the minute and having one of his beat friends in the team could make things better for him. Of course it could also backfire and him go even more off the rails. What annoys me
Most is that supposedly he was let go to sort himself out taking a break from rugby etc so if he goes and signs for hull then that statement was bull poop.

Can we actually openly talk about what went on on here?

Gleeson, Long and Tickle at the same club.

Good God.

Playing-wise - A good move.

And with the possibility of Tim Smith arriving next season.....

Brilliant.

personally im sick of gleeson threads.

hes an ex wigan player...end of

dont see many threads about other ex players,..........pointless.

I'm 22 by then think I will be granted an alcohol licence for Hull?

But for Gleeson ,The only way is up