Quote: lummy "Course youre happier Closet man - you won!
We're gutted because we really should have won the game and it's not often i've come away from your place thinking that. Poor discipline at the play the balls cost us big time in the 2nd half.
Some of the moaning on here about our supposed tactics on Sam Tomkins is laughable though. Some of your lot would be better off at Cheltenham this week with these blinkers on. He's a fantastic player, unplayable at times but that doesnt mean he should recieve special treatment form the officials.'"
Look mate, no-one is asking for 'special treatent' but a head high is a head high whether you like the player or not or whether the player complains about it to the referee or not. The shots on Sam T were high. I sit on the half way line and had a clear view of them, something I'm guessing you didn't. I'll give you the benefit of that excuse for now. Any futher argument will show you to be the blinkered, one-eyed fool you're coming across as. Unfortunately I reckon it's short odds that you'll prove that last statement to be the correct one.
. Disagree a bit about Joel being the poor relation to Sam, its like comparing who is the best Sam or Pat? Horses for courses and all that. Hopefully one day Logan Tomkins will be added to the mix and we can watch opposition fans spend all their time debating who is the worst Tomkins 
