Thought it was a cracking game of rugby to be honest and the best team won on the day. Any penalty or knock on from us was punished by a world class outfit but I felt we played really well and if we keep that standard up for the rest year and we'll be hard to beat.

Wigan would have won if Gleeson had of stayed on the park. Joel Tomkins got murdered playing at centre. Didn't think St George were all that tbh, was more impressed by Melbourne in recent years.

Our right edge defence tightened up after Gleeson went off imo. Tomkins pulled off two superb last ditch defensive efforts which kept us in it. To say St George werent all that is completely unjustified, they would have nilled most SL sides with that defensive effort, whilst drilling 50 points in to them.

I agree... I though the defensive structure looked far more robust after Gleeson left the field.

Tomkins did pull off two decent tackles and put in an incredible effort but he was getting beat on the outside near enough every time and they made massive yards because of it.

I don't see why it is completely unjustified, I thought Melbourne were a far more dangerous outfit last year, that's all. Wigan could quite easily have won that game, and Wigan are perfectly beatable in the Super League.

Who do you think would of beat us on last nights performance?

Perfectly beatable is a bit strong

If Wigan aren't perfectly beatable, you must be of the opinion they are unbeatable. There is nothing in between...

Gleeson's hamstring is clearly still unwell, odd that when he went off Wigan stopped leaking tries on the right. If the defense was tight on the right all game then SGI wouldn't have got a couple of tries.

Of course they are, as is any team.

What a strange thing to say.

Just "beatable" is surely in between? If not why did you add perfectly in front of it then as its pointless?