I dont see the problem with the bans or the fact that Wilkin complained, only he knows how much pain was caused, maybe he had a real case.
The real fact of the matter is the length of punishment, surely if during the game it was penalised, it would have been just that a penalty not a red card.
A 1 match ban for a chicken wing tackle to me suggests this is a sending off offence, which I find very hard to believe

I think it's a fair and reasonable suspension.
rlhttps://www.therfl.co.uk/disciplinaryrl

When you read that it could have been much worse. I just the same treatment is applied to all the other players who appear before the committee, so that the clubs, players and spectators can see a consistent approach.

I can't be d reading all this. Absolutely love Lenagans comments though, he's clearly sick of the bent appeals procedure and is waiting for the chance to make an outburst about it. I've got a feeling we won't have to wait too long.

Spot on.

If there's consistency across the board, no-one has a case for feeling aggrieved.

Agree mate and no sooner than its said a category c 2 game ban gets over turned!!!

Cant wait for tonights and sat nights games to pinpoint the chicken wing tackles that dont get picked up!
Wonder who Wilkin is going to tell on this week!

annoyed me this because wen ganson saw the one in his game that player hasnt got anything these rules need sorting