I disagree with 'p1e e8ter'

Darrell shows more confidence than Pryce does. He wasn't dropped last year because of his confidence because the games that he did play in he either scored or set up a couple of good tries. He was dropped last year to salford, which was a huge mistake, which is what i believe knocked his confidence.

He has come back this year fresh after an injury and looks like a completely different player, as someone on here has stated his stats, it clearly shows that he is a better player than Pryce.

How can you say that Pryce can score 10/15 yards out better than Goulding, when their tries have been similar, however Darrell has had a few where more effort has been needed. He has been very good this year and has improved so much in defense and out of the two, shows so much more confidence and the will to do things for himself to help the team.

Apart from the money, as already mentioned, that would depend on who, if any, of our other threequarters were released in order to keep him. I'd be happy with keeping him, as long as we also keep Goulding & Carmont (and the youngsters like Marsh, Thornley & Charnley, whose contract statuses I'm unsure of).

Unless, of course, we have a better signing in the pipeline...!

For Super League players at a top club not a great deal and I dont really see why it should matter anyway. You said he should be paid accordingly, which I agree with and that was my point. His status in the squad and the games that he has played mean that if he was given a new 12 month contract it should be somewhere between what an academy player and squad player earns. At this current time he has done nothing to justify any more and as such I would be very much against a contact for any more. Do You disagree or do you think he should be paid the same as a regular first choice player like Pat Richards as your post implied?

I don't think his value is as high as Richards but I would expect him to earn more than a acadamy-squad player if the plan is to use him as our left winger. I suppose only the coaches will know how they want to use him. Personally I think he comes in for some very unfair critisism but I also don't agree with the praise he gets from some quarters. At this moment I like him as our left winger but I prefer Amos to fullback. If that means he's dropped for pat and and goulding returns to the right, then so be it. I suppose when Amos is 100% we'll find out the coaches plan.

If he was on roughly the same as Goulding (however much that is), that would be about right, IMO.

Suicidal - having to put up with threads like this every other week for another 12 months is enough to put anyone over the edge.