yes fozzard did and if it wasnt his arm it was his knee, omealy is not dirty and hasnt shown any foul play in any performances, this was unfortunate incident, fozzard on the other hand, has been told time and again bout his technique and nothing has been done.

Case Number ON/412/10
Name Mark O’Meley

Incident considered Use of forearm in possession of the ball in 54th minute (Roby)
Decision No charge

Details of Charge / Reason for NF Opponent’s head makes contact with players shoulder in attempting to tackle, arm not raised before contact and no collision with forearm, players arm rises after contact but no misconduct

rlThe RFL websiterl.

Quality. SaintsFan makes herself look an idiot yet again.

Absolute classic!!

Not so. I never once claimed it was an illegal hit. I kept using modality. And if you want to know what that word means, look it up in the dictionary. Or if you haven't got one of those, Google is your friend.

Second, I still don't see how felling Roby can be justification for Fozzard felling others. It's like murdering a passer by because they happen to be from the same town as a serial killer. Not sure the police would be sympathetic to a claim of justifiable 'pay back' really. But I don't expect gooners to appreciate such subtleties.

EH?

You my dear are a comic genius.

Now Jog on