It's round 14, so we've played EVERYONE

If we play with the same fight we did against them at Murrayfeild, we'll most like walk it. Nice to see us back where we belong.

On another note, I am no relation to a certain Stain, but he's not scouse.

None of them are. (James Graham excluded...

I really hate the benefit of the doubt rule. If you can't tell from 5 different angles then you can't give it in my opinion.

Think it evened up the Eastmond 'no try' though that I think was a try.

We know we know, but it dont half wind em up!!!

but what about Pryces knock on that led to a try....so not even really.

That was a colossal own goal Steven!



Having said that the RFL should never put him or any other official in that position as any controversial decision is always going to result in this sort of reaction from the rest of us.

But it must be obvious if even Steady and Heave-o are calling the decision ridiculous.

It was just so clear - The ball quite clearly hits the top of the knee, then the players arms move upward and the next sight of the ball is on top of the player.

Now unless someone changed either the properties of the ball, allowing it to elongate when squeezed like a stress-ball, or the laws of physics, then there is no way that it got within coo-ee of the turf.

To quote a certain Jim - "Benefit of the doubt...... My ärse."

We need to treat tomorrow as though itrs a cup final. Lets also not forget about the comments made after we beat them 2 weeks ago. Lets go and show them what an enforcer really is like

I know too. But it don't half wind us up as well

We can't join in with half the songs at KR

Difficult to call Ganson a cheat when he could have awarded the Eastmond try with nary a raised eyebrow.

In terms of the Moore 'try', my understanding of the benefit of the doubt rule is that unless the video shows a try [inot[/i being scored, it should be awarded. There was a second just as Moore crossed the line, with the ball close to the ground, where vision was obscured. It's possible it was grounded (although I don't believe it was).

Ganson probably made the correct call in respect of the ruling, however I accept that this interpretation hasn't been consistently applied.

Made no real difference though, we were sufficiently awful to give you mob a Saturday night boost!

....and some Wigan fans have been calling Warrington arrogant?