Quote Cruncher="Cruncher"Whatever Wigan had announced - unless it was "Hock is off to Australia" - Millward would still be in a position to comment that Hock should go down under. Even if Wigan had already announced that Hock will re-sign once his time is served, Millward could still offer the view that he'd be better off in Aus.
Millward giving his opinion on what Hock should do with his future has no connection to anything Wigan may or may not have announced, and trying to claim that it does is a feat of intellectual gymnastics.'"
I completely disagree. Had Wigan made Hock's position with the club clear Millward would have no reason to comment.
If Hocks future with the club was already on record then if that future was he would get a new deal once his ban was complete Millward would be basically saying in public IL was wrong. That would be an extraordinary thing for a coach of another club to do and I don't think even Millward is stupid enough to do that.
Had all ties been cut as Millward suggests he equally would have no reason to comment as there would be no story there for him to milk.
I think all this is obvious when you think about it and it all stems from Wigan's lack of statement on the issue.
Millward would have no story were Hocks future already decided and the fact he has commented is directly as a result of Hock's future position not having been made public.
Dave