FORUMS > Wigan Warriors > ganson |
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
Club Coach | 267 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Jan 2005 | 20 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Dec 2009 | Jan 1970 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
11644.gif Tobias:11644.gif |
|
| Quote: Jonah.lfc "Hope all you who wanted ganson to ref are happy , he was a joke today'"
Did you watch the match?
|
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
International Board Member | 14094 | |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Aug 2002 | 22 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Dec 2019 | Jul 2016 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
2595.jpg I'm not Jesus Christ, I've come to accept that now.
[quote][b]XBrettKennyX wrote:[/b] Once more the anti SC brigade, purposely or otherwise fail to see the point.
Thick as pig swill.[/quote]:2595.jpg |
|
| Quote: Rogues Gallery "Nothing in it, however KFCs two indiscretions need to be addressed
Congratulations perhaps?
No one will get any ban from that game, it wasn't dirty enough, it was just a good hard game. The Coley high shot looked the worse, but the in game decision was correct. The tackle started around the shoulder area and bounced up.
All in all Ganson had a good game, the only real mistake was the reef decision. The Tomkins in touch was correct, the momentum of the tackle had not stopped. Had he been going over the line and plonked the ball down it would have correctly been given as a try.
|
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
Player Coach | 1341 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Aug 2007 | 17 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Dec 2011 | Dec 2011 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
34753_1277062598.gif [url=http://www.fishsta.co.uk:2vgqqjxt][img:2vgqqjxt]http://img844.imageshack.us/img844/1839/wwwfishstacoukbanner.jpg[/img:2vgqqjxt][/url:2vgqqjxt]:d7dc4b20b2c2dd7b76ac6eac29d5604e_34753.gif |
|
| Quote: Billinge_Lump "Congratulations perhaps?
No, If you think that's worse than Cunningham's high shot immediately afterwards that started at the NECK, or Cunningham's elbow shot, you need to think back to Newton on Long all that time ago.
Quote: Billinge_Lump "All in all Ganson had a good game, the only real mistake was the reef decision. The Tomkins in touch was correct, the momentum of the tackle had not stopped. Had he been going over the line and plonked the ball down it would have correctly been given as a try.'"
No, it would have been a double movement, because his arm had been grounded.
Regarding Leon Pryce, I would actually be prepared to give him the benefit of the doubt on that one. The ball had only been loose on the floor a microsecond before he committed his slide. The little after-flick could have been deliberate OR accidental.
It was slightly dangerous and irresponsible, but I'd hesitate to actually claim deliberate. Warning letter sufficient.
Cunningham? Ban him for 6 months. Purely based on being consistent with the ban Newton got, of course.
|
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
International Board Member | 14094 | |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Aug 2002 | 22 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Dec 2019 | Jul 2016 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
2595.jpg I'm not Jesus Christ, I've come to accept that now.
[quote][b]XBrettKennyX wrote:[/b] Once more the anti SC brigade, purposely or otherwise fail to see the point.
Thick as pig swill.[/quote]:2595.jpg |
|
| Quote: Fishsta "
No, it would have been a double movement, because his arm had been grounded.
'"
His momentum didn't stop as he rolled over, tries like that are generally given.
|
|
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
International Board Member | 32353 | |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Oct 2002 | 22 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Nov 2024 | Oct 2024 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
3076_1671446335.jpg SAINTS THE ORIGINAL AND PERENNIAL CHEATS
For sale full Saints kit (circa 1989). Shirts in pristine condition, but shorts badly soiled.
For 27 - 0 you get a trophy
For 75 - 0 you get sod all.
Wigan had eight in a row
Saints have five in a row:d7dc4b20b2c2dd7b76ac6eac29d5604e_3076.jpg |
|
| Quote: Billinge_Lump "His momentum didn't stop as he rolled over, tries like that are generally given.'"
50:50 call that went Saints way. No problem.
However the ball strip, the offside when Maurie passed the ball and the forward pass from Long to Meli just before Long scored were all poor (wrong ) decisions.
|
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
Club Owner | 6311 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
May 2003 | 21 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Feb 2020 | Feb 2020 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
5757.jpg [url=http://forums.rlfans.com/viewtopic.php?t=438945:2aq4ckn4][img:2aq4ckn4]http://www.rlfans.com/images/sig.gif[/img:2aq4ckn4][/url:2aq4ckn4]:5757.jpg |
|
| Quote: Pie Eyed "From listening in, I thought he got 2 calls against us wrong all night.
OK, they led to a Stains try, but you can get that number wrong in 5 minutes from Silverwood/Alibert.
Ganson wasn't perfect, but he kept the game flowing and gave both sides the chance to play their game.
He was constantly talking to both teams, pointing out things that they were doing RIGHT (he is the only ref in the league to do this), and overall had a good game.
There is something very wrong in our game if he isn't named as the ref for OT.'"
|
|
|
|
|
|