i hope you can keep hold of young mellor.

If this is the case then why weren't "the others ahead of him" given a shot?



The fact that he has been 'less impressive in the reserves as others' but has made an impressive impact in the first team just goes to show how inaccurate judging players by their performance in the reserves is.

IMO the only true measure of how ready a player is is by giving them a shot in the first team.

Well the bit you mention about the reserves suggests to me how inaccurate people's judgements of players are from their performances in the reserves. Take a lad out of his comfort zone either in the first team or on loan and you will make a more accurate judgment.

If what you're saying here is that Brian Noble's judgement is sometimes flawed, I heartily agree. That's why I hope we replace him with someone who's proved the opposite about himself.

But what you also seem to be suggesting is that, because the reserve competition is weak at present, lads need to be pitched into the first team on a regular basis to see what they can do, regardless of their form in the reserves. Yes?

If so, I disagree. The first team should certainly be made available to youngsters who the training staff feel have qualified, but it's not a training ground for just anyone.

I've slagged Brian Noble off for many things this last year. But I'm not going to slag him off over this Flanagan business, because no-one else I know thought that Flanagan was going to make it big either. And I don't buy this business about Noble never speaking to him - especially if, as you say, Nobby is close to the Flanagan family.

Mossop and Tomkins have.

You cannot just throw players in unless they earn there shirt though, that is a ridiculous notion.

It is up to him to earn his shirt.

If he played like he has in the first team in the reserves showing the same amount of desire and commitment he would have got his shot earlier.

Not on a regular basis. Just when opportunities occur that aren't injuries.

When players are off form being a better example. To give off form players like Joel Tomkins a rest instead of either sticking with off form players or shuffling about the team and playing players out of position i.e Liam Colbon in the second row and the musical chairs this season we have seen a lot.

A good example is the Huddersfield away match.

(Note my opinion would still be the same even if we had won)

I would have given Josh Vievers a shot at fullback and Cameron Phelps a chance at six. We would get an idea where Josh Vievers at also giving him a chance to show what he can do in a one off match. No pressure on you son just go out and show what you can do. This would also allow for us to see how useful Phelps is at six. His biggest strength at fullback has been his inter-linking play in attack (10 try assists to his name the most for a fullback) and also some of the kicks he has made this season in general play, I don't know if anyone has noticed, have been superb. Plus the fact the Aussies rated him as a six, he himself has said this is his favourite position and he has played at Australia and SOO as a young lad in this position - it just gives us a chance to see how much depth we have in our squad should Sam Tomkins get injured. Huddersfield have done it. Faimu (sp) playing at loose forward being an example and other various shifts.