Quote: Bilko "
Well if the loser of 1 v 4 is 4 then we will so I guess that is the logic with 4 expecting to lose but I agree. If out of 1 v 4, 1 loses but out of 2 v 3, 3 loses - we should play 3 not 1.
If both 5 and 6 win in round one then 5 could play 1 and 6 could play 3 in round two. Some reward for finishing 5th instead of 6th that is.
Doesn't this mean you are better off finishing 6th not 5th as you will avoid the top placed side until at the earliest round 3?
Dave