Cant understand some people and some of the comments there is no way the club should keep him employed, he dosent deserve a second chance the damage is already done. And to those saying he should go to schools and work with kids after what hes done COME ON PEOPLE GET A GRIP.

Keep him on. Everyone deserves a second chance imo (well most people!)

Yep, say for example that Wigan were to pay Hock to be an anti-doping champion for the RFL and work as part of a taskforce specifically campaining against drugs in the sport. Should this be authorised by the RFL as they see it as a good thing and it costs them nothing as Wigan are paying then provided that authorisation is gained from the RFL then no problems. I don't quite get why people can't understand the rule that provided the RFL say OK then it can happen.

That being said, I don't think Hock to be given the free ride or invited back to the club after the ban.

Why on earth would the RFL want Hock in this role?

What is so hard to understand about "other than authorised anti-doping education or rehabilitation programmers"?

It means education for Hock or rehabilitation for Hock not Hock doing the educating or rehabilitating of others. 5.55615234375:5