Rogue our club could commit murder and you would back them

You have been watching games at Orrell long enough to know that any faults displayed by Ainscough were displayed by him during those 3 years. Who has been the head coach of Wigan RLFC in those 3 years? Exactly Mr Duty Of Care. Why in 3 years did he not eradicate such faults? Why in those 3 years did he leave the boy to rot in the Academy which is even less taxing than the Reserves? Why was he not sent out on loan for a season? The only reason Ainscough even got in the reserves was after he played so well for England v Aus that Noble and co had no choice but to move him up. Where is Mr Duty Of Care in all this. What was the Duty of Care in stringing Priest along in the reserves and then dumping him. Will the same happen to JWalker?

Why did Mr Duty of Care not have season long loans arranged pre season for players? I think you have as good an idea as I do what Mr Noble was up to pre RLWC and during/after.

I will wager you this Rogues. Had Hansen been fit Joel Tomkins would not have played today. Have you not woken up to how the lad has been treated recently by Mr Noble? At the back half of last season Joel Tomkins was one of several players who got Mr Duty Of Care out of the mire.

This season Ainscough and Tomkins have both saved Mr Durty of Care's job and how does he repay them. exactly. Two boys playing out of position because as you known Ainscough is a right winger and Sam is a left sided half.

Loyalty, Meaningful is worth far more that rhetoric duty of care garbage spouted by a guy who thinks he's on a chef programme.

Maybe but Ainscoughs pro's far far outweigh his cons which is why he should be in the starting 13. I agree with giving him a week off as hes a young lad we need to look after. He'll be back in the 13 next week.

Hang on a minute. When Ainscough (and Tomkins) got their chances there were calls on here to be patient and not slag them off for mistakes. Quite right too. Those players you mention are all far more experienced than Ainscough so what would be the problem in having a go at them had they made such mistakes?

Sorry but you just don't have a worthwhile point here IMO.

If you want to talk about crucifying players as has been mentioned Goulding would have been hung out to dry had he played like Phelps today. That is a far more meaningful comparison.



Not paying Ainscough today was another Noble balls up. IMO Richards didn't look fit yet was risked. Celtic were no threat and Ainscough would have had a field day and we would have all enjoyed it. If Ainscough needs resting then it needs to be done in "the Big One" v Leeds or at Murrayfield v Saints. Games like that. That is a meaningful rest where this duty of care nonsense might gain some creditability.

The game today was made for Ainscough.

Dave

Fixed your typo.

Dave

How do they contradict each other?

Had the two mistakes that Shaun made against Hudds (the first being at 12-10) been made by Roberts/Phelps/Pryce then there would have been countless threads on here calling them every name under the sun.

Today when Sam made an error nobody shouted abuse at him, yet when Piggy/Roberts/Smith/Hock/Lockers/Fielden etc etc made one there was.

It's the Wigan fan mentality that I mentioned on another thread. They either like you or they don't and they usally make their minds up after 5 minutes.