We are a broad church, with varying opinions.....

its a meaningless game anyway, only the play-off's matter.................

We have some aggressive players in the pack such as Lima. He has made a huge difference to the pack which is why I am so gutted he is leaving early. Micky Mac takes no prisoners either and Hansen is hard as nails. These players do not rise to the bait and so don't get sledged anything like Hock does and Hock does rise to the bait.

I think it is obvious this is the case. However I think a 2 match ban was well over the top. Other players with a reputation have been let off with less for similar offences and I think that is why the club appealed. Not because he wasn't guilty.

Ultimately I think the only player justified in doing what he did was Tuson for being blind sided and it is also clear Hock really needs to behave now because if he doesn't his bans will not be getting any shorter.

I wonder how big Jim Mills would get on in todays game ?

Love it!!

It was nothing but a cheap shot from Moose

Different game isn't it. Professional as opposed to semi-pro and now with a disciplinary committee that can seemingly have it in for a player but strangely not others with similar reputations. So I guess it would depend on which side of the fence Jim ended up on. One of the favoured few who can get away with it or a target if they step out line.

Even though Mills had an appalling disciplinary record AFAIK, he was never really hammered by the RFL.

It used to be fun watching teams 'wind him up' knowing full well that at any second, it often did result in him losing his temper and getting the red card. IIRC he has the worst disciplinary record for sendings off ever in the history of the RFL.

I take your point Dave and agree, that the RFL seem to have their own favourites and I am pretty sure that 'Gaz' Hock isn't one of them. Neither were Messrs Cowie and Skerrett before him.