You know what they say about feeding the animals.

GF may be a pain in the backside however for a change he is right about one thing. Wimbledon Stadium was demolished and had houses built on it. Wimbledon Greyhound STADIUM whose address is PLOUGH Lane are still alive and kicking but it is due to close and be demolished to make way for a new football stadium with housing and shopping. Hence there is to be a new stadium built in Plough Lane.

Just pedantry. Perry and GF are saying the same thing but GF is making a pathetic attempt to belittle. Whether you see Wimbledon as returning to Plough lane or Wimbledon as building a new stadium on plough lane that has no connection to their previous home on Plough Lane and was referred to simply as Plough Lane matters very little. In short wimbledon are not returning to the stadium they called plough lane but are planning on building a stadium on the road where plough lane was located. They are not returning here https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Plough_Lane they are returning here https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wimbledon_Stadium

Just pedantry. Perry and GF are saying the same thing but GF is making a pathetic attempt to belittle. Whether you see Wimbledon as returning to Plough lane or Wimbledon as building a new stadium on plough lane that has no connection to their previous home on Plough Lane and was referred to simply as Plough Lane matters very little. In short wimbledon are not returning to the stadium they called plough lane but are planning on building a stadium on the road where plough lane was located. They are not returning here https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Plough_Lane they are returning here https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wimbledon_Stadium

[q"Jim P101 from the waterboy :lol drone

Which makes you wonder why he started foaming at the mouth when I asked if this was the case.
He's even made my question part of his sig, though I have not the slightest idea why.

I can think of a more *ahem* concise way of describing his character.

It's nice to see that yet another thread has become more about me than the subject under discussion, purely because some posters prefer to have a dig at my "negativity" rather than accept the facts as they are laid out.
This "pack attack" mentality is what drives posters from these forums, not my opinion.....this thread was doing fine until page 5, when it was pointed out that my geographical position apparently bars me from having an opinion about an area in which I still own a property.



Some people need to read the threads before accusing me of personal attacks and thread drifts.....most of the time it isn't me! We even had a moderator chip in without reading the thread through first.....shameful behaviour!

Back on thread.
Still no planning information available regarding the ground. It's hard to tell how many houses at Vallis way would be directly affected if they were to build a second stand across from the grand stand. As for us investing in the ground, it is owned by a charity set up by trailfinders, so any investment would probably be in return for assured tenure not part ownership.

You really believe that, because you said it.



3. Believes that he or she is “special” and unique and can only be understood by, or should associate with, other special or high-status people (or institutions)

4. Requires excessive admiration.

5. Has a sense of entitlement, i.e., unreasonable expectations of especially favourable treatment or automatic compliance with his or her expectations.

6. Is interpersonally exploitative, i.e., takes advantage of others to achieve his or her own ends.

7. Lacks empathy: is unwilling to recognize or identify with the feelings and needs of others.



Only No.s 1 + 2 missing this time.

No, it's because you always personally attack other posters that dare to disagree with you.
You're good at dishing it out, but you can't take it in return. So stop dishing it out, and the thread won't drift. It's not that complex.

Jim, I think you will find it was page 3 when you had a dig at someones post about expansion rumours at ealing that started the sniping. But you will conveniently miss that.
I will repeat my thoughts though, if we are going there with the chance of buying in and development of the ground then us that not exactly what the club needs and what we all want.
If we are going there because it's 250 a game then we really are in a dire place, and further back than the starting blocks 30 odd years ago.
But nothing has been announced yet so still all hearsay.

By the way silly little emoticons seem very childish

Which is pretty much what I said at the top of page 5 (before all the personal stuff started), and you're still spot on. If we're investing in the facility and securing a long term home, it's the best news.
If we're not, it's the worst.
Trouble is, I have a horrible feeling in the pit of my stomach....

The Trailfinders ground is owned by The Mike Gooley Trailfinders Charity. As such I doubt that The Broncos are buying in. I assume they are just renting the pitch.
So it is hardly a giant leap forward for the club.

Perry actually I agree with you, I have a feeling it's a continued nomad existence.
Just hope we stay full time and at least try to get some stability in the squad,