I would say so. On the field they boast a large amount of London born players & have a handful of players that have come through their academy. They have a coach that is not just young and British but is also hugely talented.

Off the field they have stayed in one place and built roots in the community. They have entered into a number of schools, both Primary & Secondary, and the participation in the game has increased. The club also has links with Southgate College and are linked with a subject taught there. That course is linked with the Middlesex Uni and a number of players are in further education through the club. Fan wise, it has increased heavily since I first watched them in '07.

There has also been rumours of development of the New River and that can only be good for the club.

Small steps to achieve a greater goal is a nice way of describing Skolars.

1. Make yourown bloody tea.
2. Gus stated that the teams lack of performance was "one of" the reasons for the crap crowds.....the re-brand, which he stated in the article I linked a while back, was his idea. The point of the re-brand was to "clear up any confusion" between us and the landlords and attract RL fans baclk to the game......he 100% failed in that aim ...we have less fans now than we did as Harlequins RL.........and when questioned about the crowds, he clearly stated a "winning team" would help.....ergo, he is asked why we have less fans, he replies by blaming team.


Split hairs if you like, but the fact is there was no plan B......he believed that the re-brand and the offer to ST holders would pack'em in......it didn't.....both were his ideas and if I am honest, he seemed clueless there after......anyone else in the REAL world would have been polishing their CV after a performance like that......there's missing a target and then there's 2012......we LOST fans.

And we left vouchers un-used in the ST books which could have been used to bring a mate.

Big spend is now needed to get crowds up.....if we are still faffing around on 3,000-3,250 averages next year, then I can see the London Licence being a hot topic come 2014. I am confident that a move to a new stadium for the 2014 season (where we will pay rent like we currently do) will be used to yet again cover the failings of the club.....unsurprisingly, averages will creep up in year 1 before spiralling downwards....by which stage, those responsible will have scarpered claiming that "they increased crowds" at the Broncos

I think you need a lesson or two in logic.

Meanwhile - back on topic. We're still looking for somewhere to play from 2014 onwards: www.bbc.co.uk/sport/0/rugby-league/19703458

Meanwhile - back on topic. We're still looking for somewhere to play from 2014 onwards: www.bbc.co.uk/sport/0/rugby-league/19703458

So the club seemingly has a year to exit the Stoop as a longer deal was not on the table. The question is are they capable of finding an alternative ? I'm no chess player but this sounds like Zugzwang.

Perhaps some loyal fans will get their heads out of the sand and at least accept it, the ground Has to be in London.

Thats not what Gus says on BBC sport. He made a point of referencing that 4 of the London RU teams play outside of London.

He keeps harping on about Gillingham. One of the OTR games will be there

Gillingham has a large catchment area, but starting up from there would be like starting up in Brighton. Almost no fanbase at the begining meaning that even if its a winning team it means nothing to the locals. Very much a long term strategy which is strange if DH is retiring soon?

Amazed if we do go down there especially as the average gate for the soccer is just a notch over 5K, so I'd suspect we'd average 1.2K, if that, once the novelty wears off. Goodbye Broncos and hello Hemel Stags (who have just got Haven Holidays as their main sponsor for the 2013) for us if it happens.

Will someone tell Gus how big a rugby pitch is for heavens sake. All this rubbish about having to move to increase crowds!!! Lets get a team that wins more than it loses have some sensible marketing and see what happens. Name and location are complete smokescreens IMHO - what the hell did the "rebrand " achieve - bugger all apart from throwing money down a big hole.

Rant over.

Hemel is a ridiculous suggestion for a SL club. No stadium, no money, no fan base. Why does everyone hold them up as the next big thing on the back of building a 400 seater stand after being in existence for decades?

Gillingham seems to be the only serious option, on the back of Medway Dragons heavily promoting a one off game. I have no faith in us making it work, although it probably could under the right management.

So could the Stoop!