I find it quite interesting that we are knocking an article that says good things about the club, I don't see anywhere in it where he knocks what has happened in the past.
Maybe the mistake was not saying we are continuing to spread the gospel in the junior set up.
As for setting roots, to succeed it's got to be done sometime.
As for systems in place folding, what's the other option do nothing at all?
News is about now not the past.

Do wigan train at the DW, Hudds the ground they play at? Its just a nothing story. The reality is that people are unwilling to accept or talk about the massive fall we've had and have set the bar so low anything is seen as positive.
Just tell me whats so good about the club and compared to what. Don't use your benchmark as Barnet.

Sorry for the earlier profanities......bad day and all that!
The Article in itself isn't a bad thing, but I've just watch a video of LMS talking about their game v Castleford and it's so refreshing to hear a cockney accent talking about making the GF and winning things. Henderson has achieved no more or less this year than last year and we are still light in the pack for next year when the competition will be stronger. The pathway for kids has been there for over a decade now and we are starting to see the results but we're still reliant on outsiders coming down to play for us....and Ealing is a great little venue, but we won't be playing SL games there if we do go up......IIRC we had 2 port-a-cabins as offices at Quins when we were first there....Ealing as a base is great but we need access to a 7/10k stadium and more importantly, we need a plan on how to fill it!

Had we done the unlikely next year the plan was to stay at Ealing but play our home games elsewhere. As for the future, we all know we cannot play super league at trailfinders as it stands. Trailfinders also cannot get promoted in the RU world. Trailfinders want promotion, they have to and will do something with that venue, what am not sure, just things I hear so yep just rumours.
WQ is right this year we are a step back from last year, so from a coaching point of view actually we have achieved nothing more than we expected to.
Yes we need investment, but where will that come from? DH at the moment is what we have, he was walking a few years back, no one rushed in to take over, so back to call me dog and his predictions. He may be right next year we could end up part time, sorry to say if we are fan owned that's a certainty.
What's the answer, where is the investment? Who knows

Eric Watson.....was the answer in 2006 and is still the answer!

I believe someone will come in when Toronto, NY,TO..........are in SL and it becomes a northern hemisphere game

..possibly, but not with the current RFL management in place...

GF you don't know that for fact, just because your 'mate' in NZ wont doesn't mean there aren't others. I do agree fatty Woods needs to be booted into touch with a credible business visionary replacing him.

Yeah...there are a line of them around the Trailfinders Ground just waiting to pick up what's left...and my "mate" lives in London....he's fully aware of the fall of the cub from what could have been as well as the expenses that would be incurred trying to even get us back to a level of 2006 Stability......he is a businessman first though who, to paraphrase a snippet from "Pastel Revolution",



Well done on the club for finsing their feet and doing well in 2 of the 3 seasons so far in the lower tier, but as is, the club in its current format will not be asked/get back to SL.

Maybe the club should not be in SL then. What have we done to earn the right to be in the top flight.
it may be a hard pill to swallow but maybe we have found our level for the time being.
it might just be that we have to wait for the revolution in the sport with Toronto, ny, maybe wasps in the UK to get the interest in the sport to generate the financial backer and fans to sustain a team in the elite comp

That's how I see it NB.

1. Financial Backer? Really. Have you not met Mr Hughes? He has ploughed many many many Millions into the London Broncos and to be fair to him, has a love for the game and the patience of a saint. What he doesn't have unfortunately for the club, is an ounce of business acumen and therefore the tens of millions he invested have gone down the drain. We don't need any old financial backer, we need one with business acumen. Toronto are still in their infancy and we too had a great first season albeit in SL, but I can only imagine how different things would have been if we had had an Eric Perez on our staff 15 years ago.
2. Fans are there.....they really are. It's just that we never ask them to come. How can the RFL claim 50% of their London Event attendees are from the Capital and half the TV audiences are from the south, but we were chugging along at 4k?
October 2009 we welcomed a full house of over 12k to the stoop for an anzac test and took not one detail of anyone there.......3 months later we got 3,688 for our opening game of the season and averaged 3,200 that year?
Sticking posts in the ground, announcing the KO time and declaring we are THE GREATEST GAME is not marketing.
Going large with a multiple week (expensive) run up campaign, doing radio interviews, local papers ads and advertorials, distributing tickets to all and sundry, organising a beer festival, decent half time and full time entertainment and collecting the resulting data.......that's what Toronto Wolfpack were doing from the minute they were told they were in League One.......they were dropping and following up press releases for every signing, they produced a cable TV show....all of this didn't come cheap, but look at the TENS OF MILLIONS that have been wasted on administration costs....our SKY cash covered the 1st team wages, so pretty much all of the other revenue including Mr Hughes investment was on red tape....and don't give me the rent red herring either.....it was 200k a season and even at our lowest times we were covering that on the gate.

I know this is going over some of the old basics, but it is very unfair and I believe unfounded to say we have neither had a backer or fans, because we've had both. It's just one is myopic and as such hasn't seen or cared as the others have drifted away to the tune of about 3,400 over the last decade or so...that's an 85% drop in fans attending games.

So what you are basically saying us established rugby league fans in london area need a personal invite to the games to know they are on.
Utter tosh.
Toronto are a totally different concept, brand new sport in a whole new region hence marketing! The majority of Toronto home fans don't have a clue what a quality game if rugby is and why should they?
You could market as much as you want in london, the fans ain't going to come flicking back because of a Pieter on the underground or in the metro or the standard.
You mention the Anzac test, do you seriously think emailing texting calling all those fans would result in them rushing down to watch Swinton play? La la land dreams.
Yes I have met David Hughes
Have also met mr kougash, let's have a look how Salford get on now it's a "trust" without his money.
It's the nature of sport in this country very few pro clubs in any sport can stand on there own two feet without a backer!!!!! No amount of marketing is going to change that.

What I said was that the RFL claimed half the 67,500 who came to the big-bash semi in 2013 were from London......so if we say 30,000 of those are in London, why aren't they bothering to come to club games? Have they been asked? No point in asking you "established fans"...why preach to the choir?

I'd say that whilst Union has a higher profile in London, it's unreasonable to say that Toronto and London Broncos are totally different concepts. They are actually very similar in that they were virtually unknown at their conception and up against other more established and more ingrained sports.

I don't think I've ever suggested tube posters (sic) or METRO or Standard and certainly not in this thread???

Again, that's not what I said. What I did quite clearly say was that the then club failed to get details for those people and then contact them in January the following year to invite them to come back...with an incentivised offer....the only thing that that club and the current club have in common dovetails nicely into.......

Good for you. I asked because it's well over 20,000,000 that he's dropped into the club, but as yet the penny hasn't!

Again...an irrelevant comment with no bearing on what I said?I don't care how Salford go. They're not my club...and if they were, then the Owner shouting at me and deriding me for not going to games wouldn't really classify as a warm invite.....would it to you? Rarely to "wealthy egotistical fans make good owners" as they take no heed of warnings or advice as they know better.

Well on that we agree......no amount of marketing has certainly not worked for the Broncos, because that's exactly what they did.....no amount, nothing, nada, zilch!

Toronto and london are very very different. When rugby league started as a pro club in london it was not a new sport!!!! Rugby league as we know has been played in the uk for well over 100 years, so people know the game.
Toronto, the Canadians it's the introduction of a new sport, so you are trying to attract a whole different audience and the market is totally different. As I said, the majority of Toronto fans probably would not spot a decent game of rugby league if it came and kicked them up the butt.
So as Toronto and london are similar in that they are/were new clubs, london was massively different in that it was not a new sport being offered it was a known.
You can't market the product in the same way in the UK, you are highly unlikely to attract the virgin type fans that Toronto can, why because they are not there!!!!!
You say my reference to kougash is irrelevant why? Constantly you talk about the club being a rich mans folly or toy, look at nearly every RL club, they all are!!!! So it's very relevant, when the man with the money walks away, or is pushed away, look what happens to the club, so as a comparison it's very relevant.
You asked if I had met DH I simply answered, so why the sarcastic response? If you don't want an answer why ask the question?