And then jumping straight back up to push Howell's head into the ground!

No charge for that of course.

or his gob sh*te brother diving in with the knees

Agreed.........both of the brothers grim should have beem up before the Colf Club Committee........ where they would have been asked how their mother was keeping.
What puzzles me is that the Howell ncident was judged on video evidence....so how did they not see the knee and forearm incident less that 5 seconds after the initial "tackle"?

No doubt we will be treated to another episode of Eddie and Stevo swooning over the magic of Sam Tomkins this evening, how he is the best player ever, Englands saviour, blah blah blah .......terrific think I will put the TV on mute tonight.

Anybody think that Clubb would have made the 17 today if not suspended? I suppose he might have taken Esders bench spot.

Quote: Legless " Just as slamming people's heads into the ground, or spearing a player into the ground head first has always warranted a punishment.'" ... unless it's a St Helens player doing the spearing, in which case it's the fault of the opponent for putting his head in the wrong position www.therfl.co.uk/about/disciplin ... hp?id=1368

Quote: Legless " Just as slamming people's heads into the ground, or spearing a player into the ground head first has always warranted a punishment.'" ... unless it's a St Helens player doing the spearing, in which case it's the fault of the opponent for putting his head in the wrong position www.therfl.co.uk/about/disciplin ... hp?id=1368

We are surprised

What a Surprise, how Saints can never be sinners! - he should have been given a yellow card and sent to the sin bin at the time,

I like how they come up with thisplayer does have hands between legs'"

It says he does have his hand between his legs but it is Lolesi (sp) who is at fault for lowering his head, so expect him to be punished for suggesting that a saints player had attempted an illegal tackle that had the potential to cause him injury.

Just another example of the inconsistancy in dishing out punishment for infringements.
It goes to prove what an absolute joke the disciplinary commitee are!!!

You shouldn't be worrying about other teams, Bronco Billy.

You've got enough problems with Quins and your fantasy team.

You're right about that DSWG.
Both seem to be going the same way. (Down the pan).

Yes it does now, but I could swear that when I first read it, it said "does not".

As it is now, it says "... player does have hands between legs and penalty sufficient". That doesn't read right.

If it said "does not have" then the "and" would make sense, but as it now says "does have", then logically the "and" should be a "but" should it not?

Methinks they've changed the wording after somebody pointed out to them that there were hands between legs.