I dont remember seeing this but if it is right then yes he should have been sin binned all I am asking for is equal treatment and protection for players from all fields.

Are upu suggesting that we get different treatment by officialsthan other teams? That's utter rubbish. What was the penalty count on Sunday? If I read right it was massively in our favour, that suggests we were getting penalties when we deserved them. A theme so far on our season has been us giving away too many penalties, yes I do keep a count of penalties during the games and what for! Trust me we put in our fair share of high shots, funny though I have very seldom seen anyone worrying about opposition player safety! So actually in general it is pretty equal.

Read what I said I want equal treatment for all players from all clubs I did not say London were any different to anyone else, I did not indicate I wanted more for London or we were treated differently. Read what I write not what you want to see that is what causes the problems.

The point i am making is there us equal treatment for all players! The officials penalise high shots, they use further sanctions for those that need it. Where is the evidence there us no equal treatment? You saw one thing on Sunday, another poster saw it differently obviously the match officials did not see anything that needed anything more than penalties.

Anyhow it's done now

Let's look forward to what the boys can do on Sunday, hopefully they can put in a decent performance on the grass for a change

Agree with itsmeagain - again

Itsmeagain, by saying you what equal treatment and protection for all players, you must be suggesting that as you see it at the moment there is not equal treatment! Hence the confusion. So where do you think there is not equal treatment? If the officials ping both teams for the same offence is equal. The fact one team might be commuting that offence more does not make it unequal, it means the laws of the game are being applied. What we see on the terraces as bad contact with the head can be seen totally different from 15 Mtrs away and what we see as a yellow card offence from 50/60/70 Mtrs away is actually pretty innocuous when much closer.
Just trying to get where you are saying there is unequal treatment?

The trouble is that refs support refs - I know too well as I come to games with a ref and lo and behold the ref is never wrong. Well thats blx. Get the video of the Hornets game and pick it apart from a refs perspective both for and against Broncos. From the moment he warmed up with the Hornets the wrong tone was set. When you've reviewed the video. come back and I would love to read your feedback.

Have never suggested refs don't get it wrong, every human gets things wrong. Refs dont necessarily support refs but maybe refs understand why decisions are made. If your mate is saying the ref never gets it wrong then that is wrong.
Am pretty sure thd refs team have picked thd game apart like they do every game

How many sin bins were there last Sunday out of interest?

It's of no interest to anyone Who cares ffs

Was it 2 or 3 sin bins?. I can't remember. I think there was one from each team after a dust up at the right hand end of the field looking from the clubhouse and towards the end of the game did a Hornets player get 10??
Memories gone!

Three yellows in total... 2 for the Hornets & 1 for us. Elliot Kear and Gary Middlehurst for fighting about a late hit on a Broncos player in the first half, then Jo Taira for another head-high tackle in the second.

Rugby man, not sure if you noticed the whole discussion on this thread, one of the things was the use or lack of use of sin bin for high tackles. I was not at the game and could not find a match report but saw a yellow on one of tgd videos. So was merely trying to find out how many cards and what for! Anything wrong with that? So it's of interest to someone, and I care!

Sorry ref!icon_smile.gif