Excellent. Post it on their forum, because many wouldn't care about your "making a point" stance here.

At least he has a point.

Some of the drivel that gets posted on here beggars belief.

Haven't they lost 2 out of 2?

Fine and it grieves me that the club has behaved in such a way as to turn off a dedicated supporter such as you, but what you were watching wasn't SL, was it?

Club needs to sort itself fast and get you back on board.

One thing is for sure David hughes isnt overly bothered about what is said on message board,i think last season proves that.

Maybe those who are bitter to the point of not going anymore should take a very large step back for a couple of months and focus there attentions on other aspects of there lives and see how they feel then.

Digging his heels in about Gus could be construed otherwise.

DH isnt overly bothered about anything which is why the club is dying. For an intellegent man he is extremely short sighted.

Well you can only hope AK,the Hive and Barnet have a big say in how the club will be run in the future because DH doesnt know how to run a sports club or communicate with fans

Can we have a reality check please with this criticism of David Hughes?

1. As I understand it David Hughes spends significant sums on giving you moaners who criticise him a team to watch.
2. The club employs people to communicate - its not his job.
3. The current "fans" are not the major stakeholders / funders of the club - I am imaging the principal revenues derives from TV rights and Mr Hughes.
4. Without David Hughes you have no club to support.

If you want to moan, moan about about the other things or other people.

He's either employing the wrong people or he's not giving them the tools to do the job with.Which is it

DH openly stated he hired and fired so he has to accept responsibility for this whether you like it or not.
The current fans are dwindling because of his decision making - they may not be a major contributor but the more that come along the bigger the pot - the more driven away makes for a smaller pot.

Why does it have to be either of those things?

With it being the first match at a new stadium I was surprised there was no endeavour to engage with attendees in terms of asking them to fill in a contact form on some pretence or another so that the club could then follow up and maybe encourage newcomers to come again or even people like me who first went to Fulham's first match in 1980 but went today for the first time since they went back to The Stoop and started calling themselves "QuinsRL".

Clearly the club has not been promoted properly or adequately for years, so who is to blame?,there has to be blame.

Lack of funds?