OK......try re-reading the quote from your post below first. If you still can't see it, then try to concentrate on the words in Bold.....you are essentially insulting me.......straight after you explain that in your opinion, it is usually uneducated idiots who use insults in a debate.......hello Mr Kettle.....have you met Mr Pot?

When you were on the bulls board being a scamp I don't think I clocked you being a london follower. It's nice to know where to find you though.

You wouldn't like to adopt him, would you

We do run a reciprocal respite care service. If you'd like to choose a nutter to take from our board I'll push the paperwork through.

Provided said nutter doesn't drool, reside in the shaky isles, pretend to be in marketing, or generally display narcissistic qualities, we will take him.

We'll pass thanks knowing our luck we'd end up with Gledhill...

After successive posts from Homer and Big G, who's coming next?
Rupe1? Loudmouth? ........ - life in the lower reaches may not be so bad after all.

The new way to confuse a Daily Mail reader is to have a Tory and a UKIP candidate up against each other

Presumably not in a Brooks Newmark, up against each other, way.

Gutters, you chose to wear the cap. If you read the actual words in my post did I ever use the word "you", therefore no actually I did not insult you directly, you chose to apply it to yourself.
no irony at all

Scamp! I've been called worse......

Michael. You said people who use insults were idiots.......that is brimful of irony and your in denial if you can't see that