I don't quite get what you are talking about, are you seriously saying that having Gafa at SO for the whole game was better than if we started with Skee there?
Skee knocked on once, and gave a penalty away.
Gafa continually missed tackles, twice they ran through him and scored.
I would of prefered a knock on, and a penalty given away then to have Gafa missing as many tackles as he seemed to do.
The only time he was noticeable in the whole game was when the Catalans players continueally ran all over him.
Very poor game by him, and i'd be extremely disappointed to ever see him play there again, tbh.
IMO of course.

Hindsight is a wonderful thing of course. Given the choice before the game as to start Gafa or Skee at SO, I would have chosen Gafa.

And I would have given Skee or Gigot their opportunity to play in a position they are familiar with - even if they have limited SL experience, and i think if you check my postings I said so before the game

I thought Will had a better game, and considering the stomach bug that "The Wigster" harped on about pre-match. Matt Gafa continues to disappoint, but playing in that position hardly helped him. The first half was a heroic effort, with some incredible defence - the tackle statistics - us making over 110 more tackles than them was incredible. Given the weather and the amount of tackles we were making, we needed to score the penalty before half-time, and then make a strong start. As soon as Catalans scored first in the 2nd half, it was always going to be too much for us. Overall, we did emerge with some credit. However, we have to get a win from somewhere - although one this coming Saturday looks increasingly unlikely.

You are so ironic its funny. You say I lack debating skills after i've posted various points which you obviously can't respond to.

Then you question why I continue to post on here - if someone disagrees with my point they are wrong - that is what debate is

I don't back up what I have written? Please remind me of your evidence that Skee would have had a bad game if he would have started

I get plenty out of posting on here when idiots like you reply

Join McDermott in the completely wrong club then

Priceless reply

Do you even know what you are typing?

I offer my opinion on matters but you take it like its a "distrabe against the club, manager or player" - of course I will listen counter argument. Why do I bother responding to points you make? The only person here who can't enter a discussion is your goodself, bleating when there are posts that you don't like.

Its based on my opinion you blithering fool

Am I not allowed to have an opinion on what MIGHT have happened now? Shall we stop predicting how games will finish because it will rely on what MIGHT happen during the match?

And just out of interest, when you decide to post, do you do so in the belief that you are right, or do you decide to post content that you think is incorrect?

Alot of your posts on here is that if Skee had been playing from the start, he would of knocked on loads, gave loads of penalties away.
Does that classify as 'foresight' as you keep going on and on about this word saying we're using it. Yet, you are as well?
Maybe if Skee had started the game he would of had that confidence to not knock the ball on, not give a penalty away(which imo wasn't a penalty anyway).
And Dave, I should probably stop talking sense shouldn't I?
Stop agreeing with my posts.