A vastly improved performance, our pack matched theirs but there settled back line up and there skillful threequarters did us. Sarginson did well, but I was amazed he played at centre, which was our undoing in the end. Definitely deserved something out of this one. The Salford players upped their game as they feared the crowds re-action. Talk about the crowd turning ugly. Nice to see my old stomping ground for the last time, hats off to the away crew, magnificent as ever. JOC mom.

Yes I agree we did play well in the first 60 minutes, I was pleased with Sarginson he has the ability to develop so much, but why can't we hold on and play the 80 minutes, I feel for you guys who travelled, we were in the game and I left for home only 25 minutes drive disappointed, but that sums up this season sadly.

Now I just Hope we can do something and not come bottom, in fact it will be sad and give credence to those bigoted northern fans if it is us and Crusaders at the bottom.

Chuffed for Sarginson. The lad's clearly got talent.

And we played with only 16 men, Williams didn't even get on apparently. Shrewd move by Powell.

I never understand this. Why pick 17 players and only use 16?!

Because Powell is a clueless moron.

McDermott did it quite a few times for us.. But that doesn't bode well for Powell, as he was clueless.
I assume it was just Powell learning off McDermott's tactics.. Hope he doesn't do much more of this as McD's tactics were woeful.

Could Williams have been injured and unable to play although named on the team sheet? Crusaders had to do that last week.

I actually thought you were the better side over the 80 mins and felt a bit sorry for the quinns at full time.You had a game plan and stuck to it and played good basic rugby at times,was impressed with your new lad and thought gale controlled things well for you, karl pryce is a joy to watch play and has the most freakish body in r/l !! keep your chins up and I for one have always been one for a london team and love a day out at the stoop.All the best for rest of the season.

He was at Skolars today watching the game which rather surprised.

as are all the coaches in Australia incl, the NRL who have done this.

I can never understand the obsession with using the maximum number of replacements and interchanges. Surely part of the reason for four replacements and twelve interchanges is to cover for possible injuries? If no one is injured and you feel those already on the pitch are doing a better job than someone sitting on the bench why make more changes?

I wasn't at Salford, but I feel we often seem to lose the initiative when interchanges are made involving the introduction of less experienced players. It almost feels like the situation in limited overs cricket when a captain tries to use his weakest bowler at a stage when the least damage is likely to occur.