But wouldn't past performances influence 'folks thoughts' on the next game? Or is this a head in the sand let's stay positive thread?

Well I can only comment on what Hendo said on Fri,
Not sure why you think it's head in the sand. Merely asking how people think we will fair against a team that so far are pretty even with us in the league and both of usbcoming off losing games that arguably should have won.

You would like to think a fully pro side, on a fast track, at home will run away with it. I would expect something similar to the Bulls game

Agreed

The simple truth is that we are not as good this season as we were much of last season. Injuries play their part in this, but also some of our replacements have yet to come up to scratch. Time will tell. Hendo earn your money and sort it out. It is your team!

I truth we have lacked some shape and composure in games however its hard to ignore we are now missing two starting hookers and and two starting props, I feel with these available we can still beat anyone. Fair to say replacement props have been underwhelming

I certainly think so far we have not really shown what we should be capable of. We have been better at home on plastic than away on grass though. If we get a good start then I think we will win comfortable, if we let them get early points I think it will be a struggle

Sammutt / Pitts underwhelming - really ?

Purtell yes, Roqica yes, Dixon yes, Gee / Evans not too sure yet, Spencer .... did a Stapleton

As for Grant and Channing ....

Not sure you read my post correctly...I said replacement Props!!! Spencer arrived fully fit Stapleton didnt ! We got out muscled in the middle by Toronto and have been in every game since Hull KR. That said we have enough pace and skill in back 3 to trouble anyone...just need to get the ball to them more!

Unlikely to happen. Sammut is only really interested in doing something unpredictable and Barthau is a bit meh. Pewhairangi, if played at SO, is a lovely runner but too similar to Sammut. There's no-one in the halves capable (or interested) in playing a sustainable, , disciplined, organising role. Rhys Williams was already showing signs of frustration v Toronto. You can have the best wingers in the world but if they don't get enough ball, and good quality at that, then it's pointless.

And, yes, the forwards are being pushed around a little too easily. Roqica doesn't run his size, nor does Evans (who's probably more of a 2nd row tbh). Ioane does, so too Battye and Spencer when fit, but other than that there are a lot of mid-sized second rowers in that squad.

Sammut maybe only interested in doing something unpredictable but on Fri he scored over 50% of our points on the night including 2 tries. Barthau also scored I believe so Meh! cannot be too bad can it?

The wingers are being systematically ignored and maybe irretrievably alienated unless the plays ( assuming we have any) are changed to build on known strengths.
The ball invariably goes right, until it gets to Purtell. Rhys is not a happy bunny.

Maybe harsh but is Daniel a captain?

What was the final score?

The attacking structure - and the ball getting into Hellewell's and Williams's hands - would improve if Kear went back at 1. Alternatively, maybe Sammut would fit better at full-back allowing Barthau to handle the left-hand side like last year.

Naderia do you need reminding? Ok let's take sammut and barthau out of that equation on the score last Fri between em they scored 18 points! So if you want to use that argument without the 2 players mentioned the score would have been 8-30 not 26-30
As for the wingers! How many tries have we bombed on the wing in the last few games through the last pass being dropped, it's got to have an effect on centres wanting to put that last pass out.