Why is it pedantic? Merely pointing out the role of the tj, how do you know they didn't call fwd passes?
And how would you know if the ref makes the call

I do find it quite interesting that you will not slag the team off for losing? That's quite an odd approach! It's the players who drop the ball, who slow the ptb, who are offside. Not the ref, not Danny ward, not DH

You moan at other people for going off thread but you do exactly the same thing, this thread is about Referees not about how the team played. If you would like my opinion on how the team played I will give it to you. Up until the Abdul incident I thought they were playing reasonably well I was not thinking we were going to win the game but there was a little bit of hope that we might just pinch a result at the end of the day. After the incident I thought we had no chance of winning, we had no direction we were making to many mistakes we were running sideways a lot of the time and we could not get over the try line. I would question how would the game of gone if the referee had taken charge from the start, how disheartened did the team become when they lost Abdul and Pelisser at the same time (the play maker and the hooker) what position should Cuningham have taken hooker or halfback? I feel that all Catalans games should have one of the top referees because they always try and referee the game and they will play like thugs if the referee lets them get away with it. I will also add that I have never seen Jay Pitts question the referees decisions so much during a game.

I never complain about going off thread. And fwiw it was not me that took it off thread.

The hassle after the game was kenny Edwards trying to get at elois, obviously some bad blood there. Not sure if you saw it but there was an incident in the bench area just after the sun bin involving Edwards.

As for Catalans having a go at the ref, bird was pretty quiet from what I saw.
That game was bubbling quite a lot in the second half and very easily could have kicked off again, have you thought why not?
Credit to Sam Moa and elois though, when they came back on they just got on with playing rugby.

If you actually watch the vid play back of the Sam Moa incident, as soon as the london player catches the ball he stops and gives up to the defender, momentum is gone! The whistle is in the refs mouth blowing for the penalty as soon as that happens it’s less than 2 seconds from the Moa offence not sure how he could have blown sooner anyhow.

The Ref did not blow the whistle until the fight started which was well after the incident.

Watch the play back. His whistle goes to his mouth as soon as the momentum is gone, therefore no advantage in playing on, it’s about 2 or 3 seconds.

RFL disciplinary result, agree that sin bin was correct call. Vid demonstrates no direct or indirect contact with the head.

I'm confused Northernbloke, you said previously that you had watched the playback & the head was struck! Now you say the Vid shows no contact with the head. So which playback is correct?

Like the refs, makes it up as he goes along !

Read my post!
For me it looked like head contact on the play back, I admitted that, my last post was report from RFL discip, who reviewed it, they see it different.

Maybe the panel should have gone to Specsavers!

I understand we have been victim of more poor refereeing at Huddersfield.

Or possibly poor decision making and getting taken into touch with the ball a few too many times

Well Northernbloke. A quick look around the forums you will, with your blind support of the referees, find that you are in a minority of one. In you thinking that everything that the referees do is perfect.

Didnt take you long Bosty to arouse Marvel's latest Super Hero Apology Man!

Funny though, have never seen a ref knock on.
Very seldom see a player admit to a knock on either.