kit80 never a truer word.
What iy actually boils down to is the players.
never mind coaching plays defensive patterns etc etc.
Throw ball catch ball, we never seemed to work that one out,
3 coaches cant all be rubbish

Once all the away fans get recover from their slap up curries I'm sure we'll see Gus fall back as the wave of support for him grows

Lead article in this weeks "Running Rugby" which I'm sure gutterfax will love!

"CEOs – You Get What You Pay For"

Trouble is it ain't peanuts!

club song?
[urlhttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HbeXL6AXmi0[/url

I think the poll is a little too simplistic.
There are an aray of factors for London's current plight and not one of those factors comes down to a single person or institution.

I'm sure we can all muse different reasons and different people have their own agenda's.

But any sporting business needs one of 2 things a large enough income stream, or a backer with deep pockets.

London's income stream has been reducing rather than growing, with fans falling away. Why do fans fall away, well people like a place to call home and the constant moving cannot have helped. I always find it hard to blame a financial backer as they are the ones who pour the money in the hole left between what the fans bring and the club needs.

But backers are also owners/runners and custodians of the club so they must carry some of the burden to move it forwards. Can the position be recovered???

In the short term it does not look likely, but longer term there is no reason why a London club cannot emerge into the top flight. 10 years ago, people would have laughed out of hand that Huddersfield a yo-yo club could top the league.

It may not be this London club as you know it today, but sport evolves over long periods. Big clubs like Wigan have flirted with relegation and financial ruin and that was before SL.

It's a step back, but not the end of the journey for London. Maybe a new home, or a return to the traditional name Fulham may boost attendances. Where ever the club settles, I hope it can plant roots that last for 10's of years not 1 or 2 before moving on.

It took the Saints club 10 years plus to convince their fan base to move 5 minutes to a new ground, people like to feel their club is part of their community.

and there we have it......the northern solution to a problem like London.







I despair.....I really do

Why are you trying to blame Towelie off South Park for the Broncos being crap?

I find your tone of Northern solution to be quite frankly bordering on the level of prejudice.
Not to mention your tactic of the gutter press to take a whole long statement, cut out 95% of it and then suggest that the one (not even a sentance) suddenly was the suggested solution.

You are not frustrated, you are more of a Troll than I thought.

The sentiment was about how London had been moved from pillar to post and this does not lead to fans being loyal. There is more than likely another move on the cards for London and who is to say where that may end up??

So I will say it again in full!!

It's a step back, but [size=200not[/size the end of the journey for London. [size=200Maybe[/size a [size=200new[/size home, [size=200or[/size a return to the traditional name Fulham may boost attendances. [size=200Where ever[/size the club settles, I hope it can [size=200plant roots that last for 10's of years [/sizenot 1 or 2 before moving on.


I made sure this time you could not miss the sentiment.

I could try to be clever.....but what's the point?
FUCK OFF YOU NORTHERN CUNT!

The Barnet (not in Barnet) Broncos.

Nice identity or Harrow Horses, Edgware Equines, Canons Park Colts, Nomadic Nags