Quote ="bestgameofall"I must admit, he was a real surprise signing in the off season. What puzzles me though is that with his experience, you know what you're going to get. There will be positives and negatives, which at his stage, can't necessarily be ironed out as with a youngster. So, logically, if you sign him, you've already thought of a role for him and his style of play. Then not to play him seems peculiar. Identified a player, spotted a role, signed him, paid wages, then just put him in the reserves and then on loan. A younger man maybe as an investment for the future, but not a guy of his experience.
I'm trying to think of a parallel. Say, you borrow a laptop, think, wow, this is better than mine, use it for awhile so you know all its ins an out, then off down to PCworld to purchase it. At which point you just take it home and stick it on the side and never open it up, before lending it out to someone. its probably never going to get better, will only depreciate in value and use up valuable cash.
I can't really get my head around it.'"
He's a squad player....nothing more. I reckon Brian Mc saw the issues we had last season with injuries etc and thought he'd be a good back up player should we be short on numbers at any stage this season. Nanyn has only been loaned out, he'll return in a few weeks (or however long the loan deal is) and will be ready to cover should the need arise.
I agree, at this stage of his career he's hardly going to improve a great deal, but as I said...a good squad player that to be honest wouldn't get in the team should other options be available. Atleast by being loaned out he's getting some match practise and shedding some of that rust!!!