A little more respect for the ball and that could have been a different scoreline.

Such nonsense I'm not even going to get into it. But would love to know how many instances you can recall where a side has beaten a side above them in the league with a 3:1 penalty ratio against them

Apos so why was penalty count 3 to 1

Good question. Certainly wasn't because we were excessively dirtier or poorer disciplined than they were. The opposite if anything if you consider the nonsense that went on after tackles were complete.

Thankfully yesterday happened and proved my point for me. Get a decent ref and put in a decent performance against a better side and you have a chance of a win. But if everything is being given against you, and virtually nothing for you, there's little you can do except damage limitation.

Off the top of my head.....

We drew with FC at Griffin Park due to an error at the end of the game by Ganson. Dennis Moran was clear one on one, chipped the FB and was pulled back as he chased the ball........
We lost heavily to Leeds at the Stoop as Quins after leading at Half time because Bentham only gave Webb 10 minutes instead of a red for an awful head high DELIBERATE hit on McLinden...Webb scored twice when he came back on and McLinden didn't get a penalty try which was warranted.

Referees have a massive impact on the outcome of games. If Catalan had beaten Wire last week it would have been 100% down to them messing about at the PTB. Even the head of the referees commented on it.

Nope, referees don't miss tackles or score tries, but they do influence the outcome of games and the best refs are the ones who seem even handed throughout a season.......Ashley Clown was pretty good at it.

We'll NEVER forget that one, will we?

Jim, got news for you, you can't play the game without them!

One error as you say by Mr Ganson in a draw, what about the other 79 minutes 55 seconds in the game. One incident is not the game folk conveniently forget that, it's quite funny that people think one incident decides a game what about all the other points that teams concede.
you mentioned the head of referees who do you refer too?
what's the rule for awarding a penalty try, do you know?

But an error that cost us the points - and an error that was seen live on TV! I know they're human and I know they make mistakes but I thought the whole point was you trained them to the highest standards, you give them capable assistants, and if possible you give them technology to minimise the mistake count. It's when the errors that are obvious to everyone in the stadium bar the ref that I get annoyed!

So the question to ask is does one decision make the result? My suggestion to that is no, it's the culmination of the whole 80 minutes. For example 22 22 draw catalan and Huddersfield, both teams still conceded and scored 22 points 1 knock on one fwd pass was not the defining moment it's the whole game. If a ref makes one call that is contentious fine, but maybe if that one player had not dropped the ball then the result would have been different.

Maybe play the game without officials rely on honesty of playerx

Micky, a ref could walk on with a machine pistol and empty the entire clip into one team, and you'd still say "they have to suck it up and get on with it". I'm convinced you're just trolling.

I think you hit the nail on the head though, errors are exactly that, errors and to err is human.
So as much as you train, as much as you add technology errors will still occur that goes for players as well as officials and as long as humans are involved you will not stop it. What is annoying is when the suggestion is it is deliberate or one team is unfairly dealt with by the match officials for whatever reason, you are now into violations for personal or organisational gain.

By all means get annoyed at the officials when or if they make an error, but look at all the other errors, and in fact violations made through the game by the other 26 players on the park. Basic point one mistake/error/violation determines the outcome, all of em together do.

Perry I will give you an example. A tj I know gave the ref advice in a game on a fwd pass, the ref chose to accept that advice and disallowed a try, apparently that one decision was the reason that team lost the game.
The dropped ball from a kick off that resulted in a try was irrelevant apparently, the ball kicked out on the full from re start was irrelevant apparently, it was down to one fwd pass decision.

If a ref walked on the pitch and did what you said that would be a deliberate act so nope I wouldn't say that at all, so why is it trolling.

The point in this thread is in that particular game we gave away 14 Penalties to 5 and watching that game probably personally I would only argue that one was 50/50 and could have gone either way, we lost that 50/500 decision probably due to other reasons. The 40/20 call if as most say it was a 40/20 then the call by tj was an error he may have made a mistake, 2 results from that players accept decision set scrum and start defence on 22mtrs or argue and give away a penalty starting defensive set on yr own 40 or 30 mtr line, go figure what's best option?
The thing to consider as well is how many times have you seen a ref change his mind because a player is in his face?
By all means berate the officials as supporters if you have sat near me in the stands I am pretty good at it, but as a player it's pointless, and look at everything else that has happened in a game before putting result on officials alone