That is exactly it. I like to think I am realistic when it comes to the limitations of my club. Bigging them up was not the intention. But I will certainly defend them when justified,

Needless to say sorry to hear of the
damage you were on the receiving end of but I have been fine on the rare occasions I`ve driven over the years.

Sniping at each other is just daft cn must be loving it.
What both bunches of supporters should be looking at is what can be done on a council park.
Lots has been said about ealing and how it can never expand etc, was that not the same situation copthall was in?

Leave me out of it.

Broncos unfounded superiority complex is to blame.

Which explains why you lot still can't get your head around why Skolars would rather pally up with Wigan.

Nah don't think I should leave you out if it you started the thread.

Maybe instead of looking at it as a negative and as always put a negative spin ion things look at Copt copthall as an example of the possible, don't you think before the development of that stadium people were saying what some are saying about trail finders.
By the way CN yr last thread missed a few words. "In my opinion" blah blah blah

But there's very little chance of Trailfinders being developed though is there? In spite of what DH has said on the subject.

Why? If trail finders go any further in y he RU world they have to improve.
Besides as I said many months back it is something that was being muted in Ealing well before we were going there.

As I understand things, Trailfinders ALREADY have agreements with Ealing Council, should either club playing there require extra stands, you see, some people make stuff up to suit their point, others make a phone call and ask.

They've had permission in place to put up similar stands to the ones I used to sit on at the Stoop for years. That's the facts!

"They can't expand" and "They won't get planning permission" that's something made up by a*holes (not you Rob, I'm well aware of who gave out the mis-information regarding permissions at the ground) to emphasise their point!

Another glaring example of hypocrisy.

You whinge to high heaven about thread drift normally so please explain to me how slagging off Skolars is pertinent to a thread about a former Broncos ground?

Selective reading and seeing what is not there again well done. Have a look chap I have not slagged off skolars or any other club, in fact I actively discourage anyone from doing that. The fact a couple of people on here got into a sniping tit for tat I merely suggested this was your whole intention in starting the thread.

Actually what I was suggesting was copthall is a good example of the art of the possible. Before it was developed in am pretty sure there were enough people saying it was impossible to expand that facility due to planning issues

My intention, as always, was to point out the dismal way the club operates.

As for the art of the possible I doubt Trailfinders have serious ambitions to play in the Zurich Premiership.

That leaves David Hughes to develop Vallis Way.

Nuff said.

How did London Welsh "stitch you up"?

What is an "old school tie"?

Cliche-tastic stuff. You only need "public school" for a full house.