Yeah.....I enjoy catching the highlights of the Widnes game over and over again.....our backs were on fire

www.loverugbyleague.com/news_143 ... -exit.html Strong statement

www.loverugbyleague.com/news_143 ... -exit.html Strong statement

2 games to get rid of him - 2 seasons to get rid of the towel - maybe lessons are being learnt. Then again maybe not we still have a CEO to contend with

Poor guy, hope somebody can help him to get his head straight, he really was an Entertainer when he played for Saints.

Some people are gone but not forgotten.

Gus is forgotten but not gone apparently.

It would seem that the Clubs strongly worded statement is another example of people unfit for purpose at the club. The Irony of the London Broncos statement including the term:
:bta0qhpa...is indicative of someone wanting to sound like they are in charge when in fact, they haven't a bloody clue as to what is going on. Sounds like London Broncos RLFC have sacked a player who was actually his performances "did not meet the professional levels expected'"

Why should they have to investigated further before London came out with the statement? Perhaps he hid from his new employers what was going on and maybe his performance was not what he has promised the club.He was working one day a week, perhaps he never turned up on time?
He had history at other clubs with off the field problems.Maybe London thought "Lets give him a chance" and he did not reach Londons expectations?

Drone just drone another drone excuse drone to drone attack drone the drone club drone

The club has a duty of care to its employees. Money/Wages are increasingly seen as secondary to employees seeking "good employment" whereas working conditions, benefits etc are now a key element in selecting a prospective employer. If Long had "history" and the club were "taking a chance" then I would suggest that a certain amount of research and background checks would/should have been made. As it is, if he was "late" or "didn't turn up" then most employers would at first enquire as to 'why" and try to discover the root cause and offer a pathway to sorting any problems out. The Statement from the club is curt and to the point......and as a result, the subsequent suicide bid coming to light makes them look bad, regardless of whether they actually are or not.

This is not an attack on the club, but it does point to someone not really thinking through what they were going to say or how they were going to sound.


Insightful as ever.

Quote drone paste drone self drone absorbed drone

Not in this case.

He makes valid points and I'd like to see the club make a further statement and possibly an apology, dependent on what the facts were. Whoever put out the original one chose to remain anonymous, so responsibility for it must rest with the chief exec.

Sigh?