Think the argument has been done to death, but for me it's an almost sad decision if we do end up going back the LB "brand"..................it was what it was at a period in time when it meant something to those who were involved with it & in the places and conditions that were prevelant at that time. Looking back is not the right way to move forward IMO.
The name change in of itself will mean nothing if not supported like any brand is required to be, but chosing a new name would, if it has to be done, make far more sense to me than going back to LB, however much I/we loved it at that time.
Quote: highwaymana31 "Why "sea", and why "eagles"?'"
'Cos next season half the team will be ex-Manley. Nothing wrong with that providing they can play a bit, and besides, anythings better than going back to 'Broncos'.
6679_1399761959.png[quote="dally messenger":1gysl9ow]was watching an nfl doco. on one of their teams and they used the term bomb to describe those long high passes from quaterback to running back and i think gibson took that idea, realized you cant throw the ball forward in RL and adapted it to a "bomb" kick we have[/quote:1gysl9ow]
[quote="eels fan":1gysl9ow]You poor poor obsessed fat ex vichyballin potato thieving stoaway.[/quote:1gysl9ow]:d7dc4b20b2c2dd7b76ac6eac29d5604e_6679.png
All views expressed are those of the author and not necessarily those of the RLFANS.COM or its subsites.
Whilst every effort is made to ensure that news stories, articles and images are correct, we cannot be held responsible for errors. However, if you feel any material on this website is copyrighted or incorrect in any way please contact us using the link at the top of the page so we can remove it or negotiate copyright permission.
RLFANS.COM, the owners of this website, is not responsible for the content of its sub-sites or posts, please email the author of this sub-site or post if you feel you find an article offensive or of a choice nature that you disagree with.
