RL a working class sport? Damn I didnt realise that, im watching the wrong game. Rah.

Quote ="Stewart"I see that even the Morning Star does not give satisfactory coverage to RL. See letter www.morningstaronline.co.uk/inde ... union_bias'" It did before the revisionists abandoned its historic name "The Daily Worker".

Quote ="Stewart"I see that even the Morning Star does not give satisfactory coverage to RL. See letter www.morningstaronline.co.uk/inde ... union_bias'" It did before the revisionists abandoned its historic name "The Daily Worker".

Whats the circulation of the Morning Star these days? We might be able to advertise in there

They would have to pay us

I will tear up my season ticket ...... and never to ever attend a game at the Stoop ..... if QRL 'advertise' in the rag called " The Daily Worker" aka 'The Morgan Star'.......... even if the 'offer' to pay us for the ad.!!

Shame on the lot of you.......




...and no 'jokes' please!!

Anyone know how much will it cost? Maybe if enough forum users contribute, we can make this a go-er and stormingbronco will live up to his promise?

£5 here!!

I can remember some years ago Republican News ran a very anti Irish RFU article. Since then, mines been the only house in Shalford with the Irish Tricolour hanging from the window, sadly the council refused my request to change the name of the rd to Bobby Sands Drive

How many other teams can boast having once had a player allegedly sponsored by the Communist Party of Great Britain?

"The working man's game" indeed!

Imagine the juxtaposition: a Harlequins entity - Quins being quintessentially (sic) part of the borgeious, elitist establishment being partly sponsored by an unrepentant, unreconstructed Marxist-Leninist tabloid daily, The Morning Star!

How this would sit with Quins' close ties to the military I don't know...

£20 here

was it like a red rag to a bull[size=595hitter[/size

Cancel the champagne Carruthers one is apparently working class!

That's rather good old chap, I see what you did there...............now then if I truly thought it would get rid of laughing boy I would gladly chip in for this, but we all know his promises of never posting again and not supporting this club ever again................

Still no more jokes now chaps and chappess's as we do not wish to offend the old git do we ?



<awaits>

Ageism rules.



Just g*t would suffice.

Am now of sufficient yearage myself to catagorise moi in such a bracket

G*T it be.

supporters marketing fund thread Mark II methinx.....

Nah, you're a mere whipper-snapper compared with OF. He learned all the technicalities of rugby league long before you were born and demonstrates this as he constantly dazzles us on here with his incisive tactical analyses.

Quote ="Stewart"I see that even the Morning Star does not give satisfactory coverage to RL. See letter www.morningstaronline.co.uk/inde ... union_bias'" Tells you everything you need to know about exactly how working class the British Communist Party is/was... just a playground for a particular segment of public school idiots

Quote ="Stewart"I see that even the Morning Star does not give satisfactory coverage to RL. See letter www.morningstaronline.co.uk/inde ... union_bias'" Tells you everything you need to know about exactly how working class the British Communist Party is/was... just a playground for a particular segment of public school idiots

Not wishing to sound like a Trotskyike splitter but - the first and third are by London League Publications the second is by League Publications.

Getting in on the act:
His name is David Hinchliffe. Not an MP any more but was when he wrote the book. Sat next to him when the Broncos played Wakey at GP a few years ago.

It's quite a book, that one. I remember reading it and being staggered by the scale of anti-RL dogma peddled by the RU establishment to the extent where anyone even attending an RL game could be banned sine die from Onion! Hinchliffe and the committee that he worked on worked hard to get the act passed which outlawed the discrimination.

It's interesting to note that, in the thirteen years since it went onto the statute book, RU has never apologised officially for its disgraceful behaviour over one hundred years, let alone set about restoring the assets that it was given (I'm referring to the Vichy collaborationist government which killed French RL in cahoots with the French RU). It's also ironic to note that most Onion supporters are not even aware of their code's dark past.

It did when I was sports editor. And that's a lot more recent that the name change. Pah … the young whippersnappers they've got working there now …

Back from Edinburgh funds very low but will find the money to contribute