Quote: "The system wasn't working as it was. The grading system rewards the club's that can sustain a decent product. I have no problem with it. As far as supporters of other sports laughing at Rugby League, let them. Their opinion is irrelevant.'"
Not sure you are correct Curtism. What do you consider a decent product? Are half of SL reaching that level? I would suggest not. The grading process would at the very least is arbitrary, looking at 3 years only favours under performing SL teams. You could argue that 5 or 10 years would be a better metric.
There are a number of irrelevant metrics whilst some important omissions if this process is to have any credibility.
Attendance growth at women's football has certainly been down to the national team. Sadly, our national Rugby team plays in half empty stadiums which tends to suggest teams in the North are not able to expand the supporter base much.
Most people that try a new sport, tend to have some sort of sports watching history so if they are all laughing at us, that view may well be relevant in trying to grow crowds.
Still maybe full house signs will be put up at Leeds on Saturday but that is still only 19,000.