Care to explain why the panel used no case to answer rather than sin bin sufficient or NFA? Panel noted the lifting of leg but does not move opponent in the motion of which opponent falls, is that an elaborate way of noting a dive or did two paid officials still get it right?
Traffic I agree with every word you have written above
NB if it is history and yesterdays chip paper why raise the subject again. Is it because the referees greatest fan is trying to justify the indefensibile
76030_1540929970.jpgJESUS WEPT HOW MANY TIMES?????
£20 a ticket and £15 on beer and merchandise.....so an away fan is worth £35. At best, 1,000 is the average away support split across 11 rounds and I am being really generous here, so Toronto, replacing say Wakefield will cost a SL club £35,000.
The minimum turnover of a SL club is £4,000,000 so Toronto instead of Widnes is worth less than 1% of a SL clubs turnover.
There are many valid reasons for and against expansion into America, but "AWAY FANS" isn't one of them. :d7dc4b20b2c2dd7b76ac6eac29d5604e_76030.jpg
Both valid points, still can't work out if the posts are a wind up or delusional. Whatever they are they've been shown as a waste of time and effort reading them, based on very little, if any fact.
Quote: northernbloke "As everyone says bird dived, he couldnt have dived without the leg lift, ergo, penalty.'"
Mmmmmm
Lets work on the reasonable premise that the majority of the body's mass is above the thigh and as such the body's centre of gravity is somewhere in the upper body.
Lets also assume that Newton got it right about resultant forces - unless you want to contest that NB.
It doesn't take a huge leap of understanding to appreciate that using whatever contact Brid had with the tackler as a small amount of force, and this combined with his overt lunge and roll, then he could indeed cheat the referee.
Lets work on the reasonable premise that the majority of the body's mass is above the thigh and as such the body's centre of gravity is somewhere in the upper body.
Lets also assume that Newton got it right about resultant forces - unless you want to contest that NB.
It doesn't take a huge leap of understanding to appreciate that using whatever contact Brid had with the tackler as a small amount of force, and this combined with his overt lunge and roll, then he could indeed cheat the referee.
This is exactly what happened.'"
Don't be so silly, the ref can clearly overule Newton's laws, they are paid officials after all.
All views expressed are those of the author and not necessarily those of the RLFANS.COM or its subsites.
Whilst every effort is made to ensure that news stories, articles and images are correct, we cannot be held responsible for errors. However, if you feel any material on this website is copyrighted or incorrect in any way please contact us using the link at the top of the page so we can remove it or negotiate copyright permission.
RLFANS.COM, the owners of this website, is not responsible for the content of its sub-sites or posts, please email the author of this sub-site or post if you feel you find an article offensive or of a choice nature that you disagree with.
HOW MANY TIMES?????
£20 a ticket and £15 on beer and merchandise.....so an away fan is worth £35. At best, 1,000 is the average away support split across 11 rounds and I am being really generous here, so Toronto, replacing say Wakefield will cost a SL club £35,000.
The minimum turnover of a SL club is £4,000,000 so Toronto instead of Widnes is worth less than 1% of a SL clubs turnover.
There are many valid reasons for and against expansion into America, but "AWAY FANS" isn't one of them. 
:d7dc4b20b2c2dd7b76ac6eac29d5604e_76030.jpg
