Im sure somebody will put me right here if I am wrong but iirc were we not paying less per game when we last played at a proper Rugby Stadium, ie,The Stoop. Its a pity Gutters isnt around to confirm one way or the other.

Quote: Bostwick "I saw them play a Central Park and there were not many there and then at Bourne Park which is behind Central Park and there were even less. Now Central Park Sittingbourne would suit The Broncos, its just a bi too far out of the way.'" Princes Park Dartford and you'd be talking a ground that would suit Broncos. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Princes_Park_(Dartford)

Quote: Bostwick "I saw them play a Central Park and there were not many there and then at Bourne Park which is behind Central Park and there were even less. Now Central Park Sittingbourne would suit The Broncos, its just a bi too far out of the way.'" Princes Park Dartford and you'd be talking a ground that would suit Broncos. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Princes_Park_(Dartford)

Quite right, would suit us, close to the M25 for the Northerners.

And I could cycle there from home!

I seem to remember some of the funding for Princes Park was aided by the fact rugby league was going to be played there. Not long after opening, possibly one game even, someone decided it was too expensive to open the stadium up for Kent Ravens. The rest is history.

I've visited Dartford just once and that was enough. Delayed about 3 hours on return by an overturned caravan on M25. And it's a bit far to cycle from Wiltshire.