not at all.
I posted in another thread the concept of how I would increase attendances at the club and the cost involved. This was as a result of a direct question posed by Michael and what'dya know, he immediately dismissed the facts and figures out of hand.

This is why the repeated comments about Hughes record of failings pop up.....because some people really do believe in Santa, the tooth fairy and the promises made by the club and its owner. I get it that some of the remaining fans just want to watch RL, but surely the penny will drop that the reason the club is starting to feel like a community again is because we've become a community club.....playing on a park pitch with players friends and family outnumbering actual spectators.

I get not one iota of pleasure from saying "I told you so", nor do I enjoy pulling up jaybs and his waning PR skills, but he felt the need to make a pointed comment as to the thread and its purpose so I was obliged to set him straight....again.

By the way, well spotted on the reason d'etre behind the thread. The concept of the game last week being a Grand Final is laughable.........it was nothing more than an afterthought and the fact that our full time team got absolutely hammered by part time and U20's players should be setting off alarm bells for the remaining few.....we need to recruit very well to stand a chance in 2016......and Hughes has said we will have the best or equal best squad in the comp........there's that tooth fairy again!!!!!

drone

There is a lot of junior RL being played. The Broncos run 16/19's in the top league. Unfortunately they were graded quite poorly by the recent assessment process

It surprised me how we had been downgraded, as we always seem to have put everything into development, will all being at one base this next season help, I do hope so.

The club has been downgraded everywhere else so why should the youth set up be any different.

Quote: Cowgirl Nostalgist "We're getting into Schrodinger's cat territory. If everyone is on ignore is it still possible to libel David Hughes? As I pointed out at viewtopic.php?p=18227120#p18227120 – largely for your benefit – something can be true and still be libellous. And so trying to play fast and loose with Schrödinger won't cut any ice. As also explained in that post, the board admin have received complaints about the state of this forum – hence that post. Those complaints have continued since my post. And looking at this thread and others here, there is a clear case of sensible, coherent discussions and debate being derailed by what appears to be some agendas and/or a preference for being annoying. On that basis, I will be casting a beady one over this board for a while. Don't say you weren't warned.

Quote: Cowgirl Nostalgist "We're getting into Schrodinger's cat territory. If everyone is on ignore is it still possible to libel David Hughes? As I pointed out at viewtopic.php?p=18227120#p18227120 – largely for your benefit – something can be true and still be libellous. And so trying to play fast and loose with Schrödinger won't cut any ice. As also explained in that post, the board admin have received complaints about the state of this forum – hence that post. Those complaints have continued since my post. And looking at this thread and others here, there is a clear case of sensible, coherent discussions and debate being derailed by what appears to be some agendas and/or a preference for being annoying. On that basis, I will be casting a beady one over this board for a while. Don't say you weren't warned.