Quote: Rooster Booster "1. So can anyone coach Leeds?
2. Did we have the personnel when he was at London?'"
No, the statement about the personnel is rubbish. We have a lot of structure in attack now and it's better than I have seen in the SL era. every attacking play we throw men at the line and dont get too consistent with the guy we pick out too.
Look at the depth, layers, runners and ball movement we use. Then look at the player who gets the most plaudits from his team mates. It's Kallum Watkins and he doesnt even touch the ball. He does create the space for Hardaker and BJB though.
It's something we rarely have done in the past and only really started last year. A full season under this structure and we are starting to look good with it though.
Quote: Rooster Booster "1. So can anyone coach Leeds?
2. Did we have the personnel when he was at London?'"
No, the statement about the personnel is rubbish. We have a lot of structure in attack now and it's better than I have seen in the SL era. every attacking play we throw men at the line and dont get too consistent with the guy we pick out too.
Look at the depth, layers, runners and ball movement we use. Then look at the player who gets the most plaudits from his team mates. It's Kallum Watkins and he doesnt even touch the ball. He does create the space for Hardaker and BJB though.
It's something we rarely have done in the past and only really started last year. A full season under this structure and we are starting to look good with it though.
Quote: richie166 "Cook and Macani are the only two I'd say played well. Alot of average performances with O'Callaghan never going to compete with Hall.'"
If Drinwater cut out his bullet passes at short distances it might cut out some of these dropped balls. Gave one to Vea as he was running at the line against Wakey.
All views expressed are those of the author and not necessarily those of the RLFANS.COM or its subsites.
Whilst every effort is made to ensure that news stories, articles and images are correct, we cannot be held responsible for errors. However, if you feel any material on this website is copyrighted or incorrect in any way please contact us using the link at the top of the page so we can remove it or negotiate copyright permission.
RLFANS.COM, the owners of this website, is not responsible for the content of its sub-sites or posts, please email the author of this sub-site or post if you feel you find an article offensive or of a choice nature that you disagree with.