I have to "be there" to know we are relegation favourites? As for negativity, you find a positive in 3 losses from 3 games, 2 against relegation rivals, with 43 as the average shipped per game and then come back to me.

.....the top 4 this year will include saints/Wigan/Leeds/wire/hudds....what those teams will do to us scares me.

As for my/the post you refer to as negative drivel....how so?

Bradford are a club in turmoil with their best stars being picked off, their wages being paid centrally and if no buyer can be found soon, they will liquidate. Not sure of your version of positivity, but staying up at the expense of a club going to the wall is hardly a "champagne" moment. Did you get the Bollinger out last year when Salford fielded 14 men to keep us off the bottom?
Wakey play the French next week.....I've said that the Wildcats might win and I also assert that the French will come right this year at some stage...not negativity, just reality!

Relegation IS BETWEEN 3 CLUBS.......deny it all you like, but of the 3, we are by far the weakest.

I am sick of being painted as the bad guy here....this club is ed and it is ed because it has been badly managed. People DON'T turn up because we are on the park and at promoting ourselves, not because I post a dose of realism on an internet forum.

Seriously, to so called fans like PC Plum, Tre Cool and Dotti......FUCK OFF AND PUT ME ON IGNORE. The more times you try to put "positive spin" on the flavoured bollox being served up at the club the more I will respond....we are ed even if we manage a win. Go to games, cheer the team on, but for christ's sake, stop posting like Moonies or lemmings.,......you make it sound like WE WILL GET A WIN is positive

Oh...stop annoying the moderators as well, because I am not breaking the AUP, you can all stop posting and the site won't fall over and in reality, they agree with me.

So you think hooker is his favourite position?

That's why he stayed in London and not move to Oz to take up the offer here. He thought he'd be first choice, first grade hooker.

ALLEGEDLY.

I like Mike Bishay but I don't believe he has done enough to displace Moore or Cunningham.

Moore has made around 100 metres a game, averaged around 33 tackles and 20 attacking runs per game and has set up 4 tries.

Cunningham has made a strong impact from the bench, making over 7 metres a run and has made 6 tackle busts as well as running well from dummy half and about 15 tackles from limited game time.

Both Bishay and Gigot were anonymous at Widnes and whilst Gigot was much improved versus Salford I don't think the stats support Bishay as being better second time out.

His production has been minimal in fact with just 3.67 metres averaged and 0 tries, 0 clean breaks, 0 try assists, 0 offloads, 0 tackle busts and just 3 runs from dummy half and 4 marker tackles with only 42 metres made per game.

He needs to get much more involved in the game when he next gets his opportunity, which may come soon if Moore is moved to halfback given the possible switch of Farrar.

In all fairness, he probably was when we only had about 7 players.

Absolutely.