We are competing anyway much better than expected. We arent being overun as everyone expected. Just wish we were more clinical at the line. Are they panicking or just looking for another player to take the initiative rather than themselves? COYB
Quote: Snoopy "Sadly Cunningham can be recalled at a months notice by Hull so as soon as one of their hookers get injured he will be off. Bishay will then get to play in his favourite position. Should hopefully mean he will be fresher and fitter later in the season anyway.'"
I like Mike Bishay but I don't believe he has done enough to displace Moore or Cunningham.
Moore has made around 100 metres a game, averaged around 33 tackles and 20 attacking runs per game and has set up 4 tries.
Cunningham has made a strong impact from the bench, making over 7 metres a run and has made 6 tackle busts as well as running well from dummy half and about 15 tackles from limited game time.
Both Bishay and Gigot were anonymous at Widnes and whilst Gigot was much improved versus Salford I don't think the stats support Bishay as being better second time out.
His production has been minimal in fact with just 3.67 metres averaged and 0 tries, 0 clean breaks, 0 try assists, 0 offloads, 0 tackle busts and just 3 runs from dummy half and 4 marker tackles with only 42 metres made per game.
He needs to get much more involved in the game when he next gets his opportunity, which may come soon if Moore is moved to halfback given the possible switch of Farrar.
1428_1727693289.png[url=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ae-HziERgfk:p2kbb0c5]Gus Mackay we salute you!![/url:p2kbb0c5]:d7dc4b20b2c2dd7b76ac6eac29d5604e_1428.png
Quote: Rooster Booster "That's why he stayed in London and not move to Oz to take up the offer here. He thought he'd be first choice, first grade hooker.
ALLEGEDLY.'"
In all fairness, he probably was when we only had about 7 players.
All views expressed are those of the author and not necessarily those of the RLFANS.COM or its subsites.
Whilst every effort is made to ensure that news stories, articles and images are correct, we cannot be held responsible for errors. However, if you feel any material on this website is copyrighted or incorrect in any way please contact us using the link at the top of the page so we can remove it or negotiate copyright permission.
RLFANS.COM, the owners of this website, is not responsible for the content of its sub-sites or posts, please email the author of this sub-site or post if you feel you find an article offensive or of a choice nature that you disagree with.
